Analysis of why Ferrari is the Best in 2004
 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/3693137.stm

Very good flattering analysis. Must see if u are a Schumacher or Ferrari fan, if not, it will hurt u like hot needles in the eye.

I think the biggest factor in ferraris success is michael. Rubens is no rookie. If michael was only as good as rubens ferrari would be barely ahead if at all.

I'm not so sure about that. Although I think Michael is a major part to the Ferrari success story, do you remember when he broke his leg in '99? Even though he was out for a good portion of the season, Irvine did win some races. Irvine was in contention for the championship until the last race, when Hakinnen won...

Yes, Ferrari owe huge gratitude to him, but he is by no means the only strength of the team. He still has by far the best car on the grid...

Because they have 200 million dollars every year to spend in the formula 1 , because most of the profits of selling cars goes to racing , because they have the best driver , because they have the best car , because they rock !!!

rubens will be forever the number two and michael will be the number one driver........

It prolly said so in his contract...

in small print *if u cannot pass michael by 2nd pit stop, u have to stay behind him*