For the Saleen haters
From the curretn Car & Driver
SALEEN S7 TWIN TURBO Vehicle type: mid-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 2-passenger, 2-door coupe Price as tested: $589,950 Price and option breakdown: base Saleen S7 Twin Turbo (includes $5000 freight), $585,000; polished wheels, $4950 Major standard accessories: power windows and locks, remote locking, A/C, tilting and telescoping steering wheel Sound system: Kenwood XXV-05V AM-FM radio/CD-DVD player, 2 speakers ENGINE Type: twin-turbocharged V-8, aluminum block and heads Bore x stroke: 4.12 x 4.00 in, 104.6 x 101.6mm Displacement: 427 cu in, 6991cc Compression ratio: 10.8:1 Fuel-delivery system: port injection Turbochargers: Garrett GT35R Maximum boost pressure: 6.0 psi Valve gear: pushrods, 2 valves per cylinder Power (SAE net): 750 bhp @ 6300 rpm Torque (SAE net): 700 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm Redline: 6500 rpm DRIVETRAIN Transmission: 6-speed manual Final-drive ratio: 3.20:1, limited slip Gear, Ratio, Mph/1000 rpm, Speed in gears I, 2.86, 8.8, 57 mph (6500 rpm) II, 1.61, 15.6, 102 mph (6500 rpm) III, 1.14, 22.1, 144 mph (6500 rpm) IV, 0.96, 26.2, 170 mph (6500 rpm) V, 0.81, 31.1, 202 mph (6500 rpm) VI, 0.64, 39.3, 248 mph (6300 rpm) DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 106.3 in Track, front/rear: 68.8/67.3 in Length/width/height: 188.0/78.4/41.1 in Ground clearance: 4.0 in Curb weight: 2968 lb Weight distribution, F/R: 45.0/55.0% Curb weight per horsepower: 4.0 lb Fuel capacity: 19.0 gal CHASSIS/BODY Type: steel-tube space frame reinforced with aluminum-honeycomb panels Body material: carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic and aluminum honeycomb INTERIOR SAE volume, front seat: 47 cu ft luggage: 5 cu ft Front-seat adjustments: none Restraint systems, front: manual 3-point belts SUSPENSION Front: ind, unequal-length control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar Rear: ind, unequal-length control arms with a toe-control link, coil springs, anti-roll bar STEERING Type: rack-and-pinion with hydraulic power assist Turns lock-to-lock: 2.0 Turning circle curb-to-curb: 44.3 ft BRAKES Type: hydraulic Front: 15.0 x 1.3-in vented, grooved disc Rear: 14.0 x 1.3-in vented, grooved disc WHEELS AND TIRES Wheel size: F: 9.5 x 19 in, R: 12.0 x 20 in Wheel type: forged aluminum Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2; F: 275/35ZR-19 100Y, R: 335/30ZR-20 104Y Test inflation pressures, F/R: 32/32 psi Spare: none C/D TEST RESULTS ACCELERATION: Seconds Zero to 30 mph: 1.5 40 mph: 2.2 50 mph: 2.9 60 mph: 3.4 70 mph: 3.9 80 mph: 4.7 90 mph: 5.4 100 mph: 6.2 110 mph: 7.0 120 mph: 8.4 130 mph: 9.5 140 mph: 10.9 150 mph: 13.6 160 mph: 15.6 Street start, 5–60 mph: 3.5 Top-gear acceleration, 30–50 mph: 5.7 50–70 mph: 5.4 Standing ¼-mile: 10.9 sec @ 140 mph Top speed (drag limited, mfr’s claim): 248 mph BRAKING 70–0 mph @ impending lockup: 157 ft Modulation: poor fair good excellent Front-rear balance: poor fair good HANDLING Roadholding, 200-ft-dia skidpad: 1.04 g Understeer: minimal moderate excessive PROJECTED FUEL ECONOMY EPA city driving: 9 mpg EPA highway driving: 15 mpg INTERIOR SOUND LEVEL Idle: 77 dBA Full-throttle acceleration: 96 dBA 70-mph cruising: 86 dBA |
Impressive figures, too bad it doesn't look like a "hot" supercar... hmmm :?
|
I'll take a CGT over that anyday :wink:
Instead of quoting numbers, wouldn't it be better to link the review?? http://www.caranddriver.com/article....ticle_id=10769 |
Quote:
Turns out pushrods are not the tool of the devil after all ... ;) |
^^^ well i am surprised that you didn't bash this RC45 ;) But i put up numbers only b/c most people run their mouths about what is the fastest supercar blah blah. So this is more or less here for furture debates. :D
|
And Nthfinity can back me up on this that this is the slower version of the TT-S7 the guy at NAIAS confirmed the 1000+hp version.
|
Quote:
|
Fast car ? yeah, but I don't like it and never will, and besides all its a twin turbo, bah, NA anyday...
|
Its pretty good bargain when you consider its price compared to the Bugatti veyron, and thats its top speed its almost just as good. Im not really a fan, but I gotta respect it.
|
Quote:
|
the 0-60mph figure in the first post is actually slightly slower than the original S7's numbers from some magazine (which was 3.3 seconds). taking into account different drivers, conditions, etc... the times are roughly the same, so is it fair to assume the new power of the S7 is pretty useless in that lower speed ranges?
|
Quote:
|
boooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiii innnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggggg
Is that the most expensive American car or what? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
my fuck its easy to get you yanks all pissy :lol: ' Mission accomplished lol Procced the circle jerk :wink: |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.