Squid On Suzuki GSX-R Owned - Speeders Fight Back
 

Pretty funny
:laugh::laugh:

Hahahahhahahaha.....that was funny....but i think she like it.

you just know him and that red head got together after this, I would be getting a GSXR too but the wife would kill me... and since I look like the bald guy from ghost hunters, this defense will be nill....

entertaining, made my morning thanx

Unless that bike has some extensive motor work done, it will come nowhere near 200mph. Then there is that ending which is a real good indicator of the type of rider we are dealing with.

that was priceless!!! the end was great!! i'm still laughing!!!

You look like bad a motorfucker?

Hahaha! What an idiot! He's lucky he still got to keep his licence.

He was riding a black and red motorcycle - yet the cop says he observed a silver motorcycle.

Someone lied under oath.....

^So what? Ray didn't dispute the act of speeding. He attempted to establish the defence of necessity - that he was under attack from horny girls and needed to speed up to escape their clutches.

The cop still gave false testimony.. lied under oath... commited purgery....

lol, that was a good laugh. I'm not really sure how the cop ended up calling it silver.

Maby he was blinded by the squid?
:laugh::laugh:

And that is where you are wrong. He wasn't a witness. He was a prosecutor. He could say anything he wanted to, without objection.

There are many other funny videoes on the website.
http://www.trutv.com/shows/speeders_fight_back/index.html

Good to know false charges, lies and falsified evidence are the norm in Australia... without objection.

And I do believe when the cop said "I witnessed a silver motorcycle..." he became the witness for the "prosecution"... and if he got the colour of the bike wrong then he probably made the rest up as well.

Well it's not exactly false if the accused admits to it. Furthermore, the officer could have simply explained that it appeared silver at first glance and when he followed it, it became apparent that it was not, but it didn't matter because he was more concerned about dealing with the accused, the rider of the motorcycle. The colour of the motorcycle was immaterial in this case. Furthermore, it was caught on camera and broadcast to a national audience. Not a lot of wriggle room for lies.

To have the officer who wrote the ticket prosecute the offence is a bizarre circumstance which usually isn't allowed because he may well be called as a witness. It is potential misconduct for a lawyer to take on a case if they expect to be called as a witness. In my state, for all summary matters, a sergeant from Prosecutors Command will take over. This show is about a summary court for the purpose of adjudicating non-criminal matters so certain rules can be relaxed, I suppose. It seems they are, because there does not seem to be any procedure to have witnesses testify.

But the basic principle stands - a prosecutor is not under oath. If they lie, that is a matter for the Law Society/Bar Association (if the prosecutor is a lawyer), or the police supervisors (if a police prosecutor). They still can't lie and fudge things, but it ain't a crime.

Lastly, lighten up, buddy! This was supposed to be funny! :)