Aweseom numbers... but if only the new series of superbikes didnt look so bland.
The Japanese had some of the meanest and badass looking bikes in the late 1980's early 90's... then all of a sudden things went down hill looks wisecafter about 1998. |
I agree, awesome numbers, but it just dosnt look that special
|
Quote:
Im quite a noob bikewise and you seem to know quite a lot of bikes :) By the way, is the Triumph 675 Triple a good one? |
Nice numbers/specs, design didn't change dramatically.
I want to go for my bike soon and looking at a 600CC machine. It will either be a CBR600, GSX-R 600 or a Ninja ZX6-R. :) Quote:
|
I agree with RC45 on this one. From everything I can tell the new 600RR is an amazing bike. Many are giving it raves for its street manners as well as its performance on the track. Several have even found it faster then its rivals on various tracks and have only faulted it for lacking a slipper clutch as some of the others do in this range.
I for one would buy the 600RR but it looks rather bland. I dont know. I still might. But its also pricey for a 600.........hmmmmmm Anyway, props to Honda. But when I move up to 600cc I might just find myself on an R-6 despite it being a more compromised ride for street use due to its aggressive rider position and narrow power band......I simply lovet he way the R-6 is designed. Ugh. |
I just bought a 2007 Kawasaki ZX-6R and I have to say to Honda, where do you keep taking this weight from? It is a full 27Lbs lighter then mine, thought to me the chasis is a bit less stiff and you don't get as much feedback but the steering is supposed to be a lot better with its dampener.
The biggest downside to me is purely aesthetic in that I don't like how the headlights and front end look compared to the ZX-6R. Regards, Ryan |
it looks much better in real life then in photos..
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.