![]() |
RWD Impreza coupe/AE86 reborn
from: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsAr...llCars/232133/
Quote:
http://www.autocar.co.uk/contentImag.../948895225.jpg OMG :love: affordable rwd sport coupes need to come back, well done SUBAYOTA... now where's nissan's 200 sx ? |
It's aboot damn time!
|
" Sources suggest that the coupé could cost as little as £10,000"
With a 1.6 liter engine, and 95 hp, no limited slip diff, no passing power, but hey.... at least its .... boring? And about the £10,000 bit.... V6 Mustangs are cheaper, and have more power... and tons of rigidity in the chassis for those who like bends ;) |
"will be powered by Subaru’s 2.0-litre flat four engine"
I just disagree with that 1.6 it's all really... |
great to see some of the old school japanese classics from the 80s & 90s glory days trying to make a comeback,hopefully they'll get it right. the gtr is already here...now where's the supra, silvias, and rx-7s:-P
|
Im way more interested in that 2.5 Turbo, this could be great!
|
Wonder if it is for real this time? :unsure:
|
That's some great news! Will be looking forward to that vehicle!
Nice find, fordgt! :thumbup: |
Quote:
|
Innovative!! Looking forward to learning more. Has this been confirmed anywhere officially as a project?
|
But why so generic looking?
There is little "classic" about a car that looks nothing like the great icons of yesteryear and does not even share driveline similarities. It is just a rehash of an old name to sucker people into buying it. At least make the car look somewhat retro to pay homage to the car it is supposed to be memorializing. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
RWD Subaru is confirmed and Toyota seeks to make Subaru its sporting arm...maybe.
Quote:
|
sounds like Subaru need the extra cash from sales of stock options after the goof up of the 2008 styling disaster at Subaru... and were forced into needing a "joint effort" car with Toyota.... unlike the Saab/Subaru 92x deal, where Subaru made out like mad cows by selling a non-competing Saabaru
|
Quote:
I actually liked the pig nose, though. It wasn't that bad looking and you could instantly tell it was a Subie. |
A more hopeful image
http://image.motortrend.com/f/auto-n...sports-car.jpg |
Quote:
|
The new subaru forester is one ugly SOB
|
Quote:
I loved the "pig nose?" I prefer the nomenclature of "alfa-nose" as well the new 2008 Impreza/ STi..... looks boring, and Korean at best |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Haha, I'm going to agree, that new 08 looks terrible, inside and out. From what I hear, it performs pretty terribly too. Good thing I got an 06, I think this is the best look of the latter years.
And yes, the 2.0 and the 2.5 without the turbo are slow as sin. This is mine and my buddy's cars, Black one is mine. http://photos-f.ak.facebook.com/phot...32845_8777.jpg |
This looks better. Although it's pure speculation at best.
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.au...500_450-op.jpg The Toyota version will be sold in Japan only. The rest of us gets the Subie version. Production at Subaru's Gunma plant. Boxer 2.0L ~220hp at 6,500 rpm 6 speed manual from the STI 103in wheelbase 2,866lbs 2+2 seating ~2011 release source: Inside Line |
they have to make an STI version...
|
Makes sense... although I would love to import a Toyota version
|
Quote:
Mustangs are not new.. this is.. and doesnt go through fuel like a whore on a saturday night. |
Quote:
EPA Mileage ratings Subaru WRX: 19mpg (city) 24mpg (highway) Mustang V6: 19mpg (city) 28mpg (highway) The price of having to wring out more power from a tiny 4-cylinder. ;-) *I used WRX's mileage figures since the new car's supposed to have even smaller capacity yet around the same power. It's lighter, that'd help. But it'll have the STI's gearbox. I don't know what it'll do for cruising. |
Yea, I don't know where people get the misconception that 4 cylinders are almost universally more fuel efficient than other engine configurations. Adding power to a 4 banger has the same fuel efficiency trade offs. Go back to a no compression lame cam design and you'll have a fuel sipper again.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.