I think if F1 make all teams use the same rear wing would spice things up. One thing about modern F1 cars are their aerodynamics that's true, but they also make them harder to get passed. Cars running behind them has tons of turbulence they can't get close to the car in front, let alone pass them.

So I think F1 can design a new wing that can create a little more drag and promote some more passing. What iamb thinking of is what CART teams uses when they're racing on superspeedways. I think they're called the Handford device, rear wings with a big vertical panel at the back of it. This vertical panel create drag and thus reduce speed, but it also punches a big hole in the air it create more drafting opportunities for cars behind you and making it easier to pass. Besides, these vertical panel are perfect for more advertisement at the back of the car.

Teams are still allowed to tweak the rest of the cars so it gives them even more challenge.

this year the pilots have to make the gear changes and the launch control is off but traction control still remains.here where am i they are pretty concered from the fact that F1 has become boring...i've posted and before F1with slicks would be faster.the suggestions i 've posted such as the same rear wing are suggestions that made drivers including alesi at that tv show here in italy.in fact they said that they would gain so much more from the slick that the traction of the car would based on that instead of the aerodynamics..in fact if you watch the history of the F1 you will see that theF1cars became so complicated and so not fun to drive the latest years..when i say same rear wing i don't mean change only that...i say change the rear wing in combination with the slick thing...i don't say that everybody should use the same parts.....
the F1 cars should depend on the meccanical traction instead of the aerodynamics if we want to see something different and not cars that they only make one boring lap after another....because at the end F1 lost his spirit...became because of the bosses of F1 a big advertising trick..
i want to see action....want to see the old F1 returns...when the dad villneuve use to oversteer with 200km/h trying to get rid of the half broken front wing.....
that was F1...

In my opinion, pit strategy spoil a lot of fun because the drivers don't HAVE to overtake, they just wait that the guy before to stop and then do 1 or 2 fast laps to gain a place. Where is the fun ??
I know it would be downgrade for F1 and i think that F1 should have a leader role in research and technology, that's why i don't like the idea of a unique rear wing but we can't get everything and sometimes have to make a choice, i am not the only one thinking it :Alain Prost said it and i think he is well placed to know what is showtime !!
(BTW, did you know that if Schumacher had not gone to Ferrari, Jean Todt had contacted Prost and this one had agreed to resort for Ferrari in 1996 ? Prost and Todt revealed that a few days ago ....)
It's just they are usual with traction control, if they hadn't they would be without, on the F1 Turbo times when they had 1500 bhp in practice and less sophisticated suspensions they had no TC.
This is not really the same target because on Speedways they want big downforce to paste the cars on the track and reduce the speed from, said 380 km/h to 360 km/h and make it safer.
In F1 they would prefer to reduce the corner speed to reduce danger. I can't explain it well sorry i'm short of english :wink:

i think they want to reduce speed in general no matter if it's corner speed or straight line speed. Changing rear wing could make teams become less dependent on aerodynamic (straight-line performance) and more innovation about suspension designs (cornering speed).

Imagine if the car rely on so much aero down-force that if any parts are damaged the whole car will flip into the air if the wind was blowing in the wrong way.

I always want to know what kind of contribution they have to the auto-industry in general. I wonder if they can start making more innovation that can translate into road-car application such as braking and engine designs. that way they can spend time and money designing stuff that we can enjoy also.

For example, i suggest they band the use of carbon brakes and start using other materials that can also have street application. That way they would need more braking distance and more chance of error for the less skilled drivers, it's pretty much an extension of what they were trying to achieve with the groove tire, one of their reason was it increase breaking distance compare to slicks.

In addition, since they are spending millions of dollars developing new technologies anyway, might as well make sure they're developing something we common people can use everyday. Remember for those people who are not fan of the sport they don't see why these millions are well spend, i say we make sure these millions they spend are also going to benefit society as a whole.

They should put cannons on the front of the cars like that old 90's driving game.


... that game was sweet.

On a more serious note, I'd like to see where F1 would go without any technological restrictions. Screw safety - with the increased revenues from more spectators they could attract drivers with a higher salary. Just keep the general restrictions on the car and wheel dimensions.

i just realized the stupidity of the previous comment - disregard it.

could another solution be to cut the budget of?not to let the teams spend more than a prearranged ammount of money...

The only thing that I would like to see changed in F1 is the points system, even if it reverts back to 2002's configuration. I would have loved to see Kimi win the championship last year but with Michael winning decisively more races it just didn't seem fair.

Personally, I'm a fan of the new F1, I like the restrictions and the high-technology element that F1 provides. It shows that even with all the various restrictions and limitations that are in place, the teams can still build the best car for the situation.

IMHO F1 is not centered around the driver its's centered around the car, and its the performance of the team that wins the race. Therefore with launch control and other driver aides, the work of the team is affecting the performance of the car. Likewise if there is anything that a team can do to increase the performance of their car while hindering another team's car such as custom rear wings etc, all the better (the other teams can do it too).

I understand that many people want to see F1 revert back to a more driver centered sport, but we have so many driver centered sports as it is. Which is one of the reasons I like F1 the way it is. 8)

-K

F1 we ay to be the top motosport...rapresents a technology achievement and the capabilities of a man to control as good as he can the g-forces.....
campank i disagree because as it is the driver does not give offre as he used to...doesn't seem to have the totaly control....F1 is the top motosport and shouldn't be a non driver centered sport...that is for what it was made created...
i don't think the spiritof F1 is cars that costs millions technologies,that are far from everyday cars,and grand pri that at the most part are boring with cars that make laps...
isay we must admire the nowdays F1cars i mean they are great but we also have to admire the human factor the driver
i mean take a look at moto gp to understad why today's F1 lose...