TEST LP560 vs GT2 vs F430S vs GTR‏

[a007apl]

Ferrari 430 Scuderia

Lap time 1.15,375min
0-100km/h: 3.76s
0-200km/h:11.64s
1458kg with driver


Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4

Lap time 1.15,714min
0-100km/h: 3.65s
0-200km/h:11.09s
1590kg with driver


Porsche 997 GT2

Lap time 1.15,528s
0-100km/h: 3.87s
0-200km/h:12.04s
1550kg with driver

Nissan GT-R

Lap time 1.17,600s
0-100km/h: 3.87s
0-200km/h:13.15s
1800kg with driver

[5vz-fe]

Which track?

[RC45]

Which track?

Hehe - doesn't matter - the beached whale was the slowest ;)

[yg60m]

Where are these numbers coming from ? Which magazine ?

[styla21]

That 560-4 has some balls... 11 seconds flat to 200km/h! :eek:
I can't decide between Scud and the 560-4 - I'm torn.

[ferrarif1fan89]

That really puts it into perspective just how much heavier the GTR is than....... well, everything.

[enzoferrari]

Scuderia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[a007apl]

Imagine LP560-4 Superleggera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mrgreen:

[toffytofik]

Where are these numbers coming from ? Which magazine ?
Which track?
Vairano track (Handling Course layout ~2,56km) situated in Milan, Italy (http://www.pista-asc.it/pista.php / http://www.the-fastlane.co.uk/racingcircuits/Italy/VairanoVidigulfoLong.html)
The test was done by Quattroruote (http://www.quattroruote.it/news/articolo.cfm?codice=138137) magazine. Wonder who the driver was? Alain Prost :-)

[a007apl]

Where are these numbers coming from ? Which magazine ?
I'm see in another forum

[r2r]

Imagine LP560-4 Superleggera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mrgreen:

Yeah, I'm quite impressed with Lamborghini's performance figures.

If the Superleggera will be LP560-2, the performance numbers for the competitors will be unbeatable.

--Lamborghini--:thumbup:

[toffytofik]

If the Superleggera will be LP560-2, the performance numbers for the competitors will be unbeatable.
560hp front-wheel drive Sleggera? Running circles around the competition in reverse! Mmm, i like that! :-P

I'm sure they won't change awd layout of the Gallardo platform, there's no point. The car is good as it is.

[r2r]

^ Well, introducing "-4" to the equation must have been for some good reason wouldn't you say?