View Full Version : GT-R real pics and some info
RAMMIUS
10-16-2007, 09:09 AM
http://www.motorauthority.com/news/coupes/first-picture-2008-nissan-gt-r/
yg60m
10-16-2007, 11:15 AM
Very awaited car !! :D
Svensson
10-16-2007, 01:39 PM
It's not the best looking car out there, but it sure looks agressive as hell! And those are some serious specs :shock:
Zot09
10-16-2007, 03:20 PM
It doesn't look as great as the R34, but it doesn't have a bad look either. I'm sure it will look better in person, though. Nice figures as well =)
Thanks for the link!
CMonakar
10-16-2007, 10:40 PM
I like it. It looks very similar to the concept. It's missing 2 small openings on the bumper and the GT-R logo is more subtle. I can live with that.
The interior is pretty disappointing though. The dash looks like it was inspired by Tetris and covered in plastic cow. Hopefully it looks a little more cohesive in person. Overall, I'm still very impressed by it and would love to own one.
HeilSvenska
10-16-2007, 11:35 PM
http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-gt-r.html
Here's more pics.
The front really loses whatever edge it had. It looks really bad. And the interior's boring. I still can't imagine anyone spending over $70,000 for this.
5vz-fe
10-16-2007, 11:55 PM
Worst possible interior w/ an exterior to match
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1367201&page=3
RAMMIUS
10-17-2007, 03:03 AM
I still can't imagine anyone spending over $70,000 for this.
Did you even bother to check the performance figures ? :?
Do you remember how capable the GT-R 32, 33 and 34 were ?
Remember Z-tune
I`am 110 % sure that this car worths every penny :P even if it`s more than 70000 $
unwilling
10-17-2007, 03:10 AM
I don't know about the interior. It's just not pleasing to the eyes at all. Exterior, I'm impartial. I think the R34 looked great. Hopefully those performance figures are anything but conservative.
ae86_16v
10-17-2007, 03:57 AM
Other details include the GT-R’s acceleration time of 3.5 seconds for the 0-60mph and 11.7 seconds for the quarter mile. Top speed is claimed to be a staggering 192mph.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :lol: 8)
DeMoN
10-18-2007, 01:46 PM
WOOOAAHH what a nice way to ruin the car. What a garbage front that is!
DeMoN
10-18-2007, 01:50 PM
Jesus what a crappy interior! IT seems to rev only to 7k rpm and a "race car" fitted with an AUTO gear box! What a joke this car turned out to be. I hope they learn from their retardation and dont sell anything.
5vz-fe
10-18-2007, 02:45 PM
^I think it's DSG type. (But you are spoton on the interior)
ESR_balla
11-03-2007, 06:10 AM
That interior is a joke.
pagani
11-03-2007, 07:33 AM
That interior is a joke.
Who cares about the interior if it's was my car that would be the first thing that would go anyway.
I like the front end.
:D 8) :wink:
CMonakar
11-03-2007, 09:16 AM
I still can't believe it weighs 3800lbs. That's as much as a BMW 540i ! Given the mass and the fact it's 4wd I doubt it is much fun to drive.
5vz-fe
11-12-2007, 10:11 PM
^So a M5 will prolly be not fun to drive?
SilviaEvo
11-13-2007, 03:00 AM
thats fucking ugly. R32 R33 R34 FTMFW
Igorionia
11-21-2007, 10:27 AM
http://www.ziptied.com/Coppermine/albums/userpics/10489/DSC_0366.jpg
EuropaCar
04-25-2008, 02:07 AM
ew it's butt ugly
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.