View Full Version : Jaguar XJ220
System
03-13-2007, 08:15 PM
http://img40.imagevenue.com/loc29/th_30976_Jaguar_XJ_220_Silver_Australia_1280x960_1 22_29lo.jpg (http://img40.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=30976_Jaguar_XJ_220_Silver_Australia _1280x960_122_29lo.jpg)
nthfinity
03-13-2007, 08:16 PM
The ultimate Brittish supercar experience, both looks, and speed... pitty about the V12 not being there :(
Sub Zero
nthfinity
03-13-2007, 09:15 PM
pitty about the V12 not being there :(
That's one of the reasons why I've voted only Cool.
:bah:
Still, one of the greatest supercar of its time with the EB110, the F40 and the F1 :wink:
and W8 ;)
yg60m
03-14-2007, 01:53 AM
Again a subzero, what a wonderful lines !!
novass
03-15-2007, 12:52 AM
Cool, almost subzero.
ferrarif1fan89
03-15-2007, 12:55 AM
boring engine in a gorgeous body. gave it a cool. would have been subzero if the "right" engine were in it.
silentm
03-15-2007, 12:22 PM
easily subzero for me. i have always loved the looks of it and the fact that it rapes a Zonda in a drag race is just priceless :rofl:
sameerrao
03-17-2007, 12:18 PM
Looks real sleek - a proper head turner! Was the fastest, best handling supercar till the F1 came along. Negatives include: Poorly made with gear levers coming off, V6 instead of the promised V12.
Pretty cheap supercar to buy today. ~$200,000
Cool in my book.
Didn't like the looks when I first saw it, and don't like the looks now even more.
Looks like the shape of an egg stretched. And it doesn't even have the proper heart.
Uncool! :bah:
Ghostbat
03-17-2007, 02:15 PM
Uncool. Looks way to big in the flesh. Nice lines though.
TopGearNL
03-17-2007, 03:06 PM
Cool for me..
It has nice looks, and the performance is ok but, it could have been so much better with a V12 and some other stuff sadly..
crazidude
03-19-2007, 03:05 PM
Subzero for me. Smooth lines, though a little odd, fastest thing around the ring at its time. Down side is the V12 like many said, but the V6 isn't too bad either.
nthfinity
03-19-2007, 03:39 PM
Subzero for me. Smooth lines, though a little odd, fastest thing around the ring at its time. Down side is the V12 like many said, but the V6 isn't too bad either.
I totall forgot about that!
I wonder how an EB110 would do there :P (let a lone a F1 jeje)
ViperASR
03-19-2007, 04:05 PM
would have been subzero would it not have had a twin-turbo V6
M4tt83
06-07-2007, 07:40 PM
Cool. :)
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.