View Full Version : C6 Z06 - 0-190mph..
http://www.motortrend.com/av/112_0606_sf_2006_chevrolet_corvette_z06_video/
2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 Acceleration Video
Keep your eye on the tach and speedo during a terminal velocity blast in a 2006 Corvette Z06.
The June 2006 issue of Motor Trend track tests five of America's hottest tuner vehicles against the new 505-horsepower Chevrolet Corvette Z06. A strike force of five tuner cars, 4,500 horsepower, and six tough tests were documented across 14 pages in the magazine, and in this video.
Nice :) - so thats what 505hp can do... I need to find out definitively what 480hp can do ;)
ZfrkS62
04-29-2006, 01:53 AM
you're right, that was cool :D (you forgot the "it's not european so it sucks" part)
you're right, that was cool :D (you forgot the "it's not european so it sucks" part)
The euros can kiss my arse on this one bud.. ;)
That was way cool.. and doesn't even come sloe to sucking even in their closed minds.... :)
coloradosilver
04-29-2006, 01:57 AM
Nice :) - so thats what 505hp can do... I need to find out definitively what 480hp can do ;)
I could tell you, but I wouldn't want to ruin it for you. :wink:
ZfrkS62
04-29-2006, 02:08 AM
you're right, that was cool :D (you forgot the "it's not european so it sucks" part)
The euros can kiss my arse on this one bud.. ;)
That was way cool.. and doesn't even come sloe to sucking even in their closed minds.... :)
you underestimate them :wink:
harryo2b
04-29-2006, 03:27 AM
480 Tiptronic can do 3.2 0-60 on icey conditions.
Article in latest Motor Trend magazine.
harryo2b
04-29-2006, 03:32 AM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v667/assfacekilla/6.jpg
Thanks to sdy284 from rennteam for scan.
Kiran
04-29-2006, 04:51 AM
Holy fuck, that's mclaren F1 like fast :shock: :shock: :shock:
bmwmpower
04-29-2006, 06:22 AM
impressive, no doubt thats fast car
coombsie66
04-29-2006, 08:26 AM
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
480 Tiptronic can do 3.2 0-60 on icey conditions.
Article in latest Motor Trend magazine.
And exactly WTF has that got to do with anything other than PROVE the C6 Z is a serious threat to everyone.. as your precious little article even named the Corvette as a direct competitor.
Case closed.
All you really did was prove that the 9977TT, the F430 and the C6 Z06 are so close it will come down to driver everytime.
Oh - and I will give you a couple hours chance to repost your nazi propaganda article in the porsche forum before I delete it.. this thread is about the C6 Z 0-190mph on camera run - not some "supposedly" fast porker .. afterall, the tester even admits the time is a little suspicious and will wait for another test to confirm.
Oh - and 60-0 in 116ft is 6ft longer than a 2001 C5 Z06 needed... seems porsche still can't build a better stooping car after 5 years .. :P ;)
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
And that's what makes this car able to do the things it does, without a gas guzzler tax and returns fantastic gas mileage when being used as a comute vehicle.
Remember, the design criteria for this car going in are "the most extreme performance in the most affordable package in the world - period".
And they delivered exactly that.
Supercar abilities in an affordable, reliable, robust, daily driver package ;)
harryo2b
04-29-2006, 03:45 PM
480 Tiptronic can do 3.2 0-60 on icey conditions.
Article in latest Motor Trend magazine.
And exactly WTF has that got to do with anything other than PROVE the C6 Z is a serious threat to everyone.. as your precious little article even named the Corvette as a direct competitor.
Case closed.
All you really did was prove that the 9977TT, the F430 and the C6 Z06 are so close it will come down to driver everytime.
Oh - and I will give you a couple hours chance to repost your nazi propaganda article in the porsche forum before I delete it.. this thread is about the C6 Z 0-190mph on camera run - not some "supposedly" fast porker .. afterall, the tester even admits the time is a little suspicious and will wait for another test to confirm.
Oh - and 60-0 in 116ft is 6ft longer than a 2001 C5 Z06 needed... seems porsche still can't build a better stooping car after 5 years .. :P ;)
What a testy temper. I was just stating the latest facts about the 480 hp you were wondering about. Never said the Z06 was bad. By they way I am not a German nor a Nazi so please refrain from calling or trying to relate such titles to me. I support the same flag you do.
Yes all these cars are marvelous in their numbers and that they fit the markets they are aimed for so why is it that everyone gets all worked up over it? :roll:
DeMoN
04-29-2006, 04:02 PM
the C6 Z06 is fast, on a straight line it may come down to the driver when racing an F430, but on a track with bends, come on, dont be unrealistic. It cant beat the F430 there.
Z06 is a great car, it can beat M3's, thats for sure. GT40 and Z06 are the only two american cars I'd consider having. But it cant be compared to an F430.
coombsie66
04-29-2006, 05:30 PM
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
And that's what makes this car able to do the things it does, without a gas guzzler tax and returns fantastic gas mileage when being used as a comute vehicle.
Remember, the design criteria for this car going in are "the most extreme performance in the most affordable package in the world - period".
And they delivered exactly that.
Supercar abilities in an affordable, reliable, robust, daily driver package ;)
But they could have made it quicker and still return the same MPG by sticking a 6 speed in it :wink:
nthfinity
04-29-2006, 05:50 PM
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
And that's what makes this car able to do the things it does, without a gas guzzler tax and returns fantastic gas mileage when being used as a comute vehicle.
Remember, the design criteria for this car going in are "the most extreme performance in the most affordable package in the world - period".
And they delivered exactly that.
Supercar abilities in an affordable, reliable, robust, daily driver package ;)
But they could have made it quicker and still return the same MPG by sticking a 6 speed in it :wink:
they could've broadened out 2-4th as well ;)
SFDMALEX
04-29-2006, 05:54 PM
the C6 Z06 is fast, on a straight line it may come down to the driver when racing an F430, but on a track with bends, come on, dont be unrealistic. It cant beat the F430 there.
Z06 is a great car, it can beat M3's, thats for sure. GT40 and Z06 are the only two american cars I'd consider having. But it cant be compared to an F430.
Well I wouldnt doubt the C6 chassis but common knowledge would tell me that the F430 can definetly corner faster.
480 Tiptronic can do 3.2 0-60 on icey conditions.
Article in latest Motor Trend magazine.
And exactly WTF has that got to do with anything other than PROVE the C6 Z is a serious threat to everyone.. as your precious little article even named the Corvette as a direct competitor.
Case closed.
All you really did was prove that the 9977TT, the F430 and the C6 Z06 are so close it will come down to driver everytime.
Oh - and I will give you a couple hours chance to repost your nazi propaganda article in the porsche forum before I delete it.. this thread is about the C6 Z 0-190mph on camera run - not some "supposedly" fast porker .. afterall, the tester even admits the time is a little suspicious and will wait for another test to confirm.
Oh - and 60-0 in 116ft is 6ft longer than a 2001 C5 Z06 needed... seems porsche still can't build a better stooping car after 5 years .. :P ;)
What a testy temper. I was just stating the latest facts about the 480 hp you were wondering about. Never said the Z06 was bad. By they way I am not a German nor a Nazi so please refrain from calling or trying to relate such titles to me. I support the same flag you do.
Hyperbole - look it up :)
Oh - and the nazi propaganda comment was directed at the German car - we are all well aware of your foreign station - I am thinking it is your panties that need unbunching.
BTW - if I was asking ofr a foreign HP comparison I might have asked for go-kart contributions.
The 480bhp comment was in refernce to my 480bhp ;)
Yes all these cars are marvelous in their numbers and that they fit the markets they are aimed for so why is it that everyone gets all worked up over it? :roll:
You are the one that brought your "market fitting" quote over here - not vice versa :)
I keep forgetting comments need 86 smilies per thread to not get people all cranky and shit.
:P :D :) :( :D :P :) :( :D :twisted: :wink: :cry: :lol: :D :? 8) :)
Hopefully these are enough to diffuse al the egos that come swagering in to every single C6 Z06 thread.. ;)
ZfrkS62
04-29-2006, 06:37 PM
^^ and you doubted my predictions :P :lol:
^^ and you doubted my predictions :P :lol:
I just read that 997 Turbo article. (the same magazine as the C6 Z06 video is from)
What a crock of shit.. ;)
The temp during the Porker run was 32F - that's 0c... in other words the engine was producing WAAAAAAY more than 480bhp in those temps... and it was on a the grooved surface of a concrete runway...
So... let's see the REAL numbers when a proper 997TT test is done. I don't think the car will be posting 060 in 3.2s either.
:P
ZfrkS62
04-29-2006, 09:38 PM
^^ and you doubted my predictions :P :lol:
I just read that 997 Turbo article. (the same magazine as the C6 Z06 video is from)
What a crock of shit.. ;)
The temp during the Porker run was 32F - that's 0c... in other words the engine was producing WAAAAAAY more than 480bhp in those temps... and it was on a the grooved surface of a concrete runway...
So... let's see the REAL numbers when a proper 997TT test is done. I don't think the car will be posting 060 in 3.2s either.
:P
Better yet, lets test the Z06 in the same conditions :wink:
anyone just hear a bubble burst?
the 0-120 was impressive 8)
sentra_dude
04-30-2006, 01:31 AM
Sheesh you people need to calm down! Can't we all just get along? :lol: :P
Neat vid btw, that's a fast car. :D
TeflonTron
04-30-2006, 06:11 PM
A comparison of another fast car:
http://rapidshare.de/files/6897347/Video007.3gp.html
A comparison of another fast car:
http://rapidshare.de/files/6897347/Video007.3gp.html
Exactly what is the point of posting this in here?
A reminder of where you are and what the rules are:
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=28049
Seems every now and again folks need a reminder :)
^ and it's good we have you as the official JW cop :P :wink:
^^ ;) -- they can bash and trash the American cars outside this forum all they want - and if we can, we will defend them - but in here, we should be able to discuss them without fear of thread hijacking and clogging with hate mail :P
TeflonTron
04-30-2006, 08:23 PM
Hey, I'm not bashing the Z06 (or any American car just because it's American, for that matter: must have me confused with someone else), just posting a video of another very fast car accelerating, like the Z06 in this thread, from 0 to about 190MPH. I, for one, find it "interesting" to compare how different cars accelerate faster at certain parts of the speed cycle than other cars do, and not everyone can just look at a video of a speedo and gauge how that compares to something else doing the same, so I thought that a video of something else may be of interest.
At no point did I bash the Z06 (or mention the 997 like others have in this thread), nor did I even mention the model or brand of the car in the video that I posted. If you don't want me to post a video/contribute to this thread then I won't: it's really no bother at all either way.
:lol: I agree with you 100% but I still think you'll keep getting hate mail :P either way, your doing a fine work officer :wink: a medal is just a matter of time :lol: :wink:
Hey, I'm not bashing the Z06 (or any American car just because it's American, for that matter: must have me confused with someone else), just posting a video of another very fast car accelerating, like the Z06 in this thread, from 0 to about 190MPH. I, for one, find it "interesting" to compare how different cars accelerate faster at certain parts of the speed cycle than other cars do, and not everyone can just look at a video of a speedo and gauge how that compares to something else doing the same, so I thought that a video of something else may be of interest.
At no point did I bash the Z06 (or mention the 997 like others have in this thread), nor did I even mention the model or brand of the car in the video that I posted. If you don't want me to post a video/contribute to this thread then I won't: it's really no bother at all either way.
This is true.
And the explanation makes sense. ;)
SFDMALEX
04-30-2006, 08:57 PM
Vette rule! :P
So do I like get banned?.........or something.........? :P
Vette rule! :P
So do I like get banned?.........or something.........? :P
WHy would you get banned for saying they rule? :P
SFDMALEX
04-30-2006, 09:01 PM
Vette rule! :P
So do I like get banned?.........or something.........? :P
WHy would you get banned for saying they rule? :P
Just wait till you hit the Ferrari forum :P
I got dem editing skills too :P
T-Bird
04-30-2006, 10:02 PM
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
And that's what makes this car able to do the things it does, without a gas guzzler tax and returns fantastic gas mileage when being used as a comute vehicle.
Remember, the design criteria for this car going in are "the most extreme performance in the most affordable package in the world - period".
And they delivered exactly that.
Supercar abilities in an affordable, reliable, robust, daily driver package ;)
But they could have made it quicker and still return the same MPG by sticking a 6 speed in it :wink:
Unless I am missing something here....
IT HAS A BLOODY 6 SPEED IN IT!
Vette rule! :P
So do I like get banned?.........or something.........? :P
WHy would you get banned for saying they rule? :P
Just wait till you hit the Ferrari forum :P
I got dem editing skills too :P
;)
What joo talkin about Willis? ;) :P hehe
TeflonTron
04-30-2006, 10:59 PM
Just click on either "Quicktime High" or "Windows High" to start streaming the video. Hope that helps.
TeflonTron
04-30-2006, 11:39 PM
It does seem very slow, but once you've clicked on either of the two media players it takes a while, but it will play an advert, and then play the file. From when I clicked to when video came up was about 35 seconds.
TeflonTron
05-01-2006, 01:37 AM
You're welcome.
How did you find the actual footage? Interesting/worth the wait?
DeMoN
05-03-2006, 12:43 AM
upon re-viewing this, it says 190 in 5th gear? it doesnt have 6th gear? WTF? I sure hope it does cuz such an expensive car with 5 gears doesnt look that good.
nthfinity
05-03-2006, 12:59 AM
upon re-viewing this, it says 190 in 5th gear? it doesnt have 6th gear? WTF? I sure hope it does cuz such an expensive car with 5 gears doesnt look that good.
some people really dont know much about the Vette, or the Ford GT for that matter...
6th gear is there to get good fuel economy under cruising conditions.
6th is essentially a dubble o/d; and 5th is there for your top speed runs. simple as that... and while 5th could be shorter in relation to 3rd/4th. that is exactly how the Vette manages 28 mpg highway.
if cirtain lower gears were shorter, then the massive storm of torque isn't managable.
upon re-viewing this, it says 190 in 5th gear? it doesnt have 6th gear? WTF? I sure hope it does cuz such an expensive car with 5 gears doesnt look that good.
some people really dont know much about the Vette, or the Ford GT for that matter...
6th gear is there to get good fuel economy under cruising conditions.
6th is essentially a dubble o/d; and 5th is there for your top speed runs. simple as that... and while 5th could be shorter in relation to 3rd/4th. that is exactly how the Vette manages 28 mpg highway.
if cirtain lower gears were shorter, then the massive storm of torque isn't managable.
Yep - another example of a supposedly educated person being ignorant.
Simply doing a Google search on "C6 Z06 specs" would have returned all the informaiton a reasnoable informed person needed to not show their obvious bias and ignorance.
Quite tiring.
DeMoN
05-03-2006, 08:49 AM
Yep - another example of a supposedly educated person being ignorant.
Simply doing a Google search on "C6 Z06 specs" would have returned all the informaiton a reasnoable informed person needed to not show their obvious bias and ignorance.
Quite tiring.
Being that I dont care about the Corvette, I dont go deep-reading on it. I just know enough. In the same way I can list a shietload of info for another car wich isnt of your interest and then call you stupid for not knowing them. If I were ignorant, I would have gotten a C6 or C5 corvette instead of the G35 that I have. The only person around here that should "quit trying" is you and your idea that the Corvette is the best thing "ever evar fo realz."
Ah, and another thing about you calling Ferrari buyer's "posers"... at least 85% of the corvette drivers I see are old grampas. I rather see a "poser" on his ferrari, often speeding then a fukin Corvette with an OLD ASS driver that all he does is slow me down.
nthfinity
05-03-2006, 09:17 AM
Yep - another example of a supposedly educated person being ignorant.
Simply doing a Google search on "C6 Z06 specs" would have returned all the informaiton a reasnoable informed person needed to not show their obvious bias and ignorance.
Quite tiring.
Being that I dont care about the Corvette, I dont go deep-reading on it. I just know enough. In the same way I can list a shietload of info for another car wich isnt of your interest and then call you stupid for not knowing them. If I were ignorant, I would have gotten a C6 or C5 corvette instead of the G35 that I have. The only person around here that should "quit trying" is you and your idea that the Corvette is the best thing "ever evar fo realz."
Ah, and another thing about you calling Ferrari buyer's "posers"... at least 85% of the corvette drivers I see are old grampas. I rather see a "poser" on his ferrari, often speeding then a fukin Corvette with an OLD ASS driver that all he does is slow me down.
Florida: where old people migrate to die :wink:
Yep - another example of a supposedly educated person being ignorant.
Simply doing a Google search on "C6 Z06 specs" would have returned all the informaiton a reasnoable informed person needed to not show their obvious bias and ignorance.
Quite tiring.
Being that I dont care about the Corvette, I dont go deep-reading on it. I just know enough. In the same way I can list a shietload of info for another car wich isnt of your interest and then call you stupid for not knowing them. If I were ignorant, I would have gotten a C6 or C5 corvette instead of the G35 that I have. The only person around here that should "quit trying" is you and your idea that the Corvette is the best thing "ever evar fo realz."
Ah, and another thing about you calling Ferrari buyer's "posers"... at least 85% of the corvette drivers I see are old grampas. I rather see a "poser" on his ferrari, often speeding then a fukin Corvette with an OLD ASS driver that all he does is slow me down.
You don't know enough - you prove this everytime you open your mouth
The only person around here that should "quit trying" is you and your idea that the Corvette is the best thing "ever evar fo realz."
These are your words not mine.
The only person around here that should "quit trying" is you and your idea that the Corvette is the best thing "ever evar fo realz."
LMAO!!!! hahahaha
Typical arsehole response from you.
To be expected and not surprising.
I am done with this shit.
dutchmasterflex
05-03-2006, 01:26 PM
I JUST made it into this thread today, skipping to the last page..
and here I find RC45 retiring?!?!
c'mon ya old fart, you letting your age get to you?
DeMoN
05-03-2006, 02:59 PM
Retiring? from work or what?
TeflonTron
05-03-2006, 04:35 PM
To Florida of course, silly goose.
coombsie66
05-03-2006, 04:55 PM
Quick car, but damn 5th is seriously long! I bet that slows it considerably in the 4th to 5th change region, needs a 6 speed.
And that's what makes this car able to do the things it does, without a gas guzzler tax and returns fantastic gas mileage when being used as a comute vehicle.
Remember, the design criteria for this car going in are "the most extreme performance in the most affordable package in the world - period".
And they delivered exactly that.
Supercar abilities in an affordable, reliable, robust, daily driver package ;)
But they could have made it quicker and still return the same MPG by sticking a 6 speed in it :wink:
Unless I am missing something here....
IT HAS A BLOODY 6 SPEED IN IT!
Well i stand corrected, but i was implying more the considerable jump in ratios between 4th and 5th, but if a very tall 6th is required to get around regulations then i understand why its there, just it would undoubtably make the car faster if it used all 6 ratio's to get to its top speed. :)
T-Bird
05-03-2006, 08:57 PM
No doubt that it could be shit loads faster but the fact that we have gas guzzler taxes on cars really pushes the auto makers to get those mileage numbers up as high as possible without comprimizing too much performance. hell they are talking about making a minimum mileage for SUVs at more than double what most are producing today. The fact that this thing manages better economy than most Acura's we have at work is saying something.
sentra_dude
05-03-2006, 09:58 PM
Well i stand corrected, but i was implying more the considerable jump in ratios between 4th and 5th, but if a very tall 6th is required to get around regulations then i understand why its there, just it would undoubtably make the car faster if it used all 6 ratio's to get to its top speed. :)
I'd say its less to get around regulations than to make the car even more appealing as an everyday driver. It certainly is a nice benefit to avoid a $3000(?) gas guzzler tax, but the excellent benefit of 28mpg in a 505hp car is even better. The 28mpg far out-weighs the slight loss in top speed IMO...and who really goes 190mph or 200mph anyways? If I had a 505hp car I drove everyday I'd love to be able to get 28mpg with it, even for a slight penalty in topspeed. ;)
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.