PDA

View Full Version : Top Gear Jeremy clarkson test of Buggatti veyron, article


SilverPhoenix
11-26-2005, 11:41 PM
Bugatti Veyron
By Jeremy Clarkson of The Sunday Times
Utterly, stunningly, jaw droppingly brilliant


When you push a car past 180mph, the world starts to get awfully fizzy and a little bit frightening. When you go past 200mph it actually becomes blurred. Almost like you’re trapped in an early Queen pop video. At this sort of speed the tyres and the suspension are reacting to events that happened some time ago, and they have not finished reacting before they’re being asked to do something else. The result is a terrifying vibration that rattles your optical nerves, causing double vision. This is not good when you’re covering 300ft a second.

Happily, stopping distances become irrelevant because you won’t see the obstacle in the first place. By the time you know it was there, you’ll have gone through the windscreen, through the Pearly Gates and be half way across God’s breakfast table.

It has always been thus. When Louis Rigolly broke the 100mph barrier in his Gobron in 1904, the vibration would have been terrifying. And I dare say that driving an E-type at 150mph in 1966 must have been a bit sporty as well.

But once you go past 200mph it isn’t just the suspension and the tyres you have to worry about. The biggest problem is the air. At 100mph it’s relaxed. At 150mph it’s a breeze. But at 200mph it has sufficient power to lift an 800,000lb jumbo jet off the ground. A 200mph gust of wind is strong enough to knock down an entire city. So getting a car to behave itself in conditions like these is tough.

At 200mph you can feel the front of the car getting light as it starts to lift. As a result you start to lose your steering, so you aren’t even able to steer round whatever it is you can’t see because of the vibrations. Make no mistake, 200mph is at the limit of what man can do right now. Which is why the new Bugatti Veyron is worthy of some industrial strength genuflection. Because it can do 252mph. And that’s just mad — 252mph means that in straight and level flight this car is as near as makes no difference as fast as a Hawker Hurricane.

You might point out at this juncture that the McLaren F1 could top 240mph, but at that speed it was pretty much out of control. And anyway it really isn’t in the same league as the Bugatti. In a drag race you could let the McLaren get to 120mph before setting off in the Veyron. And you’d still get to 200mph first. The Bugatti is way, way faster than anything else the roads have seen.

Of course, at £810,000, it is also jolly expensive, but when you look at the history of its development you’ll discover it’s rather more than just a car . . .

It all started when Ferdinand Piëch, the swivel-eyed former boss of Volkswagen, bought Bugatti and had someone design a concept car. “This,” he said, “is what the next Bugatti will look like.” And then, without consulting anyone, he went on. “And it vill have an engine that develops 1000 horsepower and it vill be capable of 400kph.”

His engineers were horrified. But they set to work anyway, mating two Audi V8s to create an 8 litre W16. Which was then garnished with four turbochargers. Needless to say, the end result produced about as much power as the earth’s core, which is fine. But somehow the giant had to be cooled, which is why the Veyron has no engine cover and why it has 10 — count them — 10 radiators. Then things got tricky because the power had to be harnessed.

For this, VW went to Ricardo, a British company that makes gearboxes for various Formula One teams.

“God, it was hard,” said one of the engineers I know vaguely. “The gearbox in an F1 car only has to last a few hours. Volkswagen wanted the Veyron’s to last 10 or 20 years. And remember, the Bugatti is a damn sight more powerful than any F1 car.”

The result, a seven-speed double-clutch flappy paddle affair, took a team of 50 engineers five years to perfect.

With this done, the Veyron was shipped to Sauber’s F1 wind tunnel where it quickly became apparent that while the magic 1000bhp figure had been achieved, they were miles off the target top speed of 400kph (248mph). The body of the car just wasn’t aerodynamic enough, and Volkswagen wouldn’t let them change the basic shape to get round the problem.

The bods at Sauber threw up their hands, saying they only had experience of aerodynamics up to maybe 360kph, which is the effective top speed in Formula One. Beyond this point Bugatti was on its own.

Somehow they had to find an extra 30kph, and there was no point in looking to the engine for answers because each extra 1kph increase in speed requires an extra 8bhp from the power plant. An extra 30kph then would need an extra 240bhp. That was not possible.

The extra speed had to come from changing small things on the body. They started by fitting smaller door mirrors, which upped the top speed a bit but at too high a price. It turned out that the bigger ones had been keeping the nose of the car on the ground. Without them the stability was gone.

In other words, the door mirrors were generating downforce. That gives you an idea of how much of a bastard the air can be at this speed.

After some public failures, fires and accidents, and one chief being fired, they hit on the idea of a car that automatically changes shape depending on what speed you’re going.

At 137mph, the nose of the car is lowered by 2in and the big rear spoiler slides into the slipstream. The effect is profound. You can feel the back of the car being pressed into the road.

However, with the spoiler in place the drag is so great you’re limited to just 231mph. To go faster than that you have to stop and insert your ignition key in a slot on the floor. This lowers the whole car still further and locks the big back wing down. Now you have reduced downforce, which means you won’t be going round any corners, but you have a clean shape. And that means you can top 400kph.

That’s 370ft a second.

You might want to ponder that for a moment. Covering the length of a football pitch, in a second, in a car. And then you might want to think about the braking system. A VW Polo will generate 0.6g if you stamp on the middle pedal hard. You get that from the air brake alone on a Veyron. Factor in the carbon ceramic discs and you will pull up from 250mph in just 10sec. Sounds good, but in those 10sec you’ll have covered a third of a mile.

That’s five football pitches to stop.

I didn’t care. On a recent drive across Europe I desperately wanted to reach the top speed but I ran out of road when the needle hit 240mph. Where, astonishingly, it felt planted. Totally and utterly rock steady. It felt sublime.

Not quiet, though. The engine sounds like Victorian plumbing — it looks like Victorian plumbing as well, to be honest — and the roar from the tyres was biblical. But it still felt brilliant. Utterly, stunningly, mind blowingly, jaw droppingly brilliant.

And then I reached the Alps where, unbelievably, it got better. I expected this road rocket to be absolutely useless in the bends but it felt like a big Lotus Elise.

Occasionally, if I accelerated hard in a tight corner, it behaved strangely as the four-wheel-drive system decided which axle would be best equipped to deal with the wave of power. I won’t say it’s a nasty feel or dangerous. Just weird, in the same way that the duck-billed platypus is weird.

You learn to raise an eyebrow at what’s only a foible, and then, as the road straightens out, steady yourself for Prince Albert’s boiler to gird its loins and play havoc with the space-time continuum. No, really, you come round a bend, see what appears to be miles and miles of dead straight road, bury your foot in the carpet and with a big asthmatic wheeze, bang, you’re instantly at the next bend, with your eyebrow raised again.

From behind the wheel of a Veyron, France is the size of a small coconut. I cannot tell you how fast I crossed it the other day. Because you simply wouldn’t believe me. I also cannot tell you how good this car is. I just don’t have the vocabulary. I just end up stammering and dribbling and talking wide-eyed nonsense. And everyone thinks I’m on drugs.

This car cannot be judged in the same way that we judge other cars. It meets drive-by noise and emission regulations and it can be driven by someone whose only qualification is an ability to reverse round corners and do an emergency stop. So technically it is a car. And yet it just isn’t.

Other cars are small guesthouses on the front at Brighton and the Bugatti is the Burj Al Arab. It makes even the Enzo and the Porsche Carrera GT feel slow and pointless. It is a triumph for lunacy over common sense, a triumph for man over nature and a triumph for Volkswagen over absolutely every other car maker in the world.



http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,12529-1890873,00.html

blinkmeat
11-27-2005, 12:22 AM
cool article can't wait to see the feature :D

coloradosilver
11-27-2005, 12:42 AM
Holy shit! If this car is as good as Clarkson says it is, I may have to give it a little more credit. But for th reasons I have already stated in the "Cool or uncool" forum, I still say its uncool.

Daggernite
11-27-2005, 12:56 AM
A big lotus Elise is a bold statement. I thought to myself it would only be a straight line car. But it looks like it can take the corners too :shock:

graywolf624
11-27-2005, 01:34 AM
Viva la incorrect linking.

And its Clarkson. He drives an SLK, what does he know about cars(to steal a guests line).

sentra_dude
11-27-2005, 02:01 AM
Haha, nice review, wait until everso hears about this, he will flip-out. :P

nchs09
11-27-2005, 02:15 AM
very cool read. this video will be epic.

PATo355
11-27-2005, 03:09 AM
Cant wait to see it ...... it seems to be astonishing by his words

Fleischmann
11-27-2005, 04:25 AM
Looks like VW have created their dream, they pulled it off. Somehow, deep inside, I ignored the scepticism I knew it would come out sooner or later. And judging by Clarksons words, Bugatti will even shut the mouths of those who claim the handling is compromised. Over 5 years of development, tons of money spent on the project but they've succeded. An amazing achievement. I already can't wait for the TG feature coming up soon.

yg60m
11-27-2005, 05:26 AM
Thanks for this article mate. Interesting to have JC opinion on the Veyron :wink: As usually it is not really the opinion of most people :P

Anonymous
11-27-2005, 05:41 AM
Thanks for this article mate. Interesting to have JC opinion on the Veyron :wink: As usually it is not really the opinion of most people :P

Although it does show something, he's been taking the piss out of it and its development for years :lol:! He's no racing driver, but neither are most of us, or the potential owners! Still I can't see how they could change the laws of physics :P A car that heavy surely can't be that good through the bends!

komotar
11-27-2005, 05:59 AM
everso will go bananas when he's going to read this :lol:

thx for the article. 8)

I think the Veyron is suprising anybody that sit's in it....I wonder if and when Tiff will get behing the wheel of it.......and the comparrison with the Mclaren will be inevitable :wink:

Anonymous
11-27-2005, 06:05 AM
everso will go bananas when he's going to read this :lol:

thx for the article. 8)

I wonder if and when Tiff will get behing the wheel of it.......and the comparrison with the Mclaren will be inevitable :wink:

They'll break it, then tell you how its a shit car because the press demo car (if there is such a thing for the veyron) which gets the shit beat out of it by motoring journo's had the cheek to break on them. They are so mickey mouse they have no facilities to fix it and no time to refilm :bah: When it happens to top gear they just get sent another one or that one fixed and film another day, they seem to break every Aston and still come out with great features :D

Fleischmann
11-27-2005, 06:24 AM
^^^exactly, you hear them from time to time saying thing like "The Stig took it around the track a few days back and the gearbox broke after 3 laps". They just phone the company and have the car fixed or get a new press car. The filming is still done, with no drawbacks.

Anonymous
11-27-2005, 08:03 AM
And then I reached the Alps where, unbelievably, it got better. I expected this road rocket to be absolutely useless in the bends but it felt like a big Lotus Elise.

Now I really didn't expect that. I thought it would be hard and tricky...as early reports said. About it being trivky arund The Ring and so on.

But if this is true.....the perfect supercar has been made. :) I still don't like the looks at all, but 400kph is very impressive.

Great article, thanks.

Just been reading in Top Gear mag, Gordon Murray is quite complementory too about how it behaves through the bends, good enough for me :D

leo_26782
11-27-2005, 08:47 AM
:? Might be better than what many people expected, but I'll wait and see for other opinions :?

Shinigami
11-27-2005, 12:31 PM
Viva la incorrect linking.

And its Clarkson. He drives an SLK, what does he know about cars(to steal a guests line).
Did you drive the new SLK 55 AMG? Most people who have, have liked the car very much. Are you saying people like TT who mentioned that the car was fun to drive, are all wrong?

Shinigami
11-27-2005, 12:50 PM
I just find it wrong for some people to talk sh1t about a car if they haven't actually driven it... kind of wrong IMO, but opinions are like a$$holes, we all have 'em ;)

Anyway, on my business trip to Japan, I bought the latest Top Gear and Evo, which both had articles about the Veyron. Both praised the car, and Top Gear even had Gordon Murray talk about how well the car handled.

Yes, 2 tons is quite a lot of car (actually, I think it's said to be 2.1 tons without driver), yet the car is able to keep down in corners surprisingly well! Weight can be a disadvantage WHEN you cannot harness it. Maybe Bugatti discovered a way to keep the car under control even though it weighs so much.

I hope I get a chance to drive it one day... so many cars, so little time ;)

5.7 V10
11-27-2005, 01:11 PM
810,000 pounds... Ouch

I think i'd rather have a Zonda F (400,000 pounds) and a Carrera GT (322,015 pounds)

Thx for the link :D

graywolf624
11-27-2005, 02:36 PM
Did you drive the new SLK 55 AMG? Most people who have, have liked the car very much. Are you saying people like TT who mentioned that the car was fun to drive, are all wrong?


don't mind graywolf...he doesn't know anything;)
He's also joking, but apparently some people don't have a sense of humour.

Though for the record I have some mercedes contacts(as some information I shared last year proved), I could technically snap my fingers and drive any of their current models if I chose (with the possible exception of the slr). Would you prefer before making a jk about styling stolen from someone on tv I went and drove the car? Do you really think vehicle dynamics would make a difference in a stolen jk about styling.

edit- added current to models in case anyone trys to push for proof, though I think certain things Ive shared before prove that point.

coloradosilver
11-27-2005, 02:56 PM
I just find it wrong for some people to talk sh1t about a car if they haven't actually driven it... kind of wrong IMO,

I don't have to drive a Hyundai Accent to tell you that it's a peice of shit.

My friend has an Audi A4 thats 3 years old, I've never driven it, but I can tell you that I would never own one. Too slow for me, way to many mechanical problems, and overpriced.

Driving a car is not always necessary to make a judgment.

Aus240
11-30-2005, 07:21 PM
Any ideas if top gear, 5th gear will feature a test on camera?? I can't wait to see it in action. 8)

Anonymous
11-30-2005, 07:27 PM
Any ideas if top gear, 5th gear will feature a test on camera?? I can't wait to see it in action. 8)

Certainly top gear are in this series ;-)

http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=33919

sledgeham
12-02-2005, 01:04 AM
boy o boy
if JC is impressed, i am too
that guy is so hard to please..
im at a loss of words.. is it really gona be THAT good?!
and VW managed to pull it off.. wonder what will ever better this monster

Anonymous
12-02-2005, 09:50 AM
BTW, do you know if the 'Stig' will set a lap with the Veyron?? :wink:

I hope so, but I doubt it :-( Already I am wondering how the hell they got permission to take it across Europe so early! Still once they've taken it that far, its only a relatively short hop from Gordon Ramsey's Restaurant to the Top Gear studios! :D

nthfinity
12-02-2005, 10:15 AM
BTW, do you know if the 'Stig' will set a lap with the Veyron?? :wink:

I hope so, but I doubt it :-( Already I am wondering how the hell they got permission to take it across Europe so early! Still once they've taken it that far, its only a relatively short hop from Gordon Ramsey's Restaurant to the Top Gear studios! :D
i really hope so, in fact...im sure it would be a very fast time on their track, with all the straights... it favours cars with high power... even so; i would like to see it happen.

4.5 million viewers in the UK alone... millions more worldwide...and what percentage of that group is in the "i can buy anything" catagory... its practically free international advertising; when they know they have a good product on thier hands, im not suprised one bit :-D