Log in

View Full Version : Apple owes Microsoft $ because they stole the iPod!!!


Toronto
08-19-2005, 02:21 AM
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13411878,00.html

right.... stupid on the part of apple for not getting a patent when the iPod came out.

racer_f50
08-19-2005, 03:59 AM
way to go Apple! definitely stupid not to have patented it earlier, especially with a company like MS around. I say good job MS on finding a new way of making millions at the expense of a competitor :clap:

komotar
08-19-2005, 04:08 AM
One below the waist for MS...............but, that's business.

It's Apple's own fault.

Court awaits. But I don't think Apple can get far.

exhausted mules
08-19-2005, 10:22 PM
bill gates is rich for a reason...

you think your gonna get far by playing fair?

bmagni
08-19-2005, 10:28 PM
this is what u get when you dont patent something before releasing it, i dont think microsoft is doing it in a way to fuck apple, maybe they had the idea earlier and apple stole it... who really knows ??

bill gates is rich for a reason...

you think your gonna get far by playing fair?

so now hes rich cause he doesnt play fair ?????

graywolf624
08-19-2005, 10:38 PM
The article is complete crap:
First discrepencies.. first they say they filed the patent 2 months before apple.. Only thing is.. then they say they filed it over a year before and before the product was released:
microsoft snuck in to license technology the previous may
Thats also 6 months before release.

2) The first to invent gets the patent not the first to file in the US and you cant patent something thats already on the market.

3) the patent office doesnt rule on the type of things described.

ferrarif1fan89
08-20-2005, 12:46 AM
dammit graywolf, you got to it before me. this article is complete bull.

Sachmo12345
08-20-2005, 02:38 AM
nice work on microsofts part. im sorry but if i could make millions of dollars by doing simple things like that i would definatly to it. Spend all the free money on supercars and a proper garage to house them.

tigerx
08-22-2005, 09:41 PM
wait, is the patent on the name only? or is it on the actual parts?

if it's on name only why don't Apple just change the name to something like: ePods

Toronto
08-22-2005, 11:09 PM
No patents are on designs