PDA

View Full Version : Somewhere in Sweden: AMG, M, Gallardo, Porsche's


Just_me
04-18-2005, 04:37 AM
More pics and video soon. For instance, new M5 beating E55, RS6 and new M5 driving tie with a Gallardo.

http://www.m5board.com/vbullet...53104 (http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=53104)

http://www.m5board.com/vbullet...nt=74 (http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=536924&postcount=74)

http://www.rs6.com/forum/showt...44940 (http://www.rs6.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=44940)


Check links for updates



Over 150km/h, the new M5 beated cars like :
Gallardo manual gear
New Viper
Techart 510 HP 996 Turbo.

It completely humiliates:
Porsche 993 Turbo with Turbo S engine package
E55 AMG Kompressor
E39 M5
Carrera 996 mkII

It is fair to say it is even to Gallardo, it depends whoever gets the jump. But there is a fari chanse that above 240 km/h the M5 will pass the Galalrdo and esp Viper. The M5 was clearly faster over 180 km/h than the Viper.


M5 beast the E55 AMG with 4 people in the M5

Get the SMG, no question about it. The car is totally sick.

700+ pics with 7 MP and 2 DV-tapes

M-power

blah
04-18-2005, 06:10 AM
Holy shit..The E55 is a 12.5 second 12.4 second 1/4 car. Damn the M5 must haul some real ass. 8)

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 07:33 AM
Must say I'm a little confused. Since this info comes from Bmw fanatics I'm skeptical. And I seriously doubt that the new M5 humiliates the 993 Turbo with the S engine package.

In a comparison test in march between the BMW M5 and the E55 AMG Estate the performance figures were very identical. The figures comes from "Teknikens Värld", a well respected car magazine in Sweden.

M5 0-70km/h 3.10s
E55T 0-70km/h 3.03s

M5 0-100km/h 4.73s
E55T 0-100km/h 4.77s

M5 0-200km/h 13.73s
E55T 0-200km/h 14.33s

M5 0-250km/h 23.28s
E55T 0-250km/h 24.48s

M5 0-402m 12.68s @ 192.4km/h
E55T 0-402m 12.78s @ 188.4km/h

Both cars running on wintertyres and have in mind that the E55 has a 100kg higher curbweight and is behind on power but is torquier..

ikon2003
04-18-2005, 08:54 AM
^Good reply Ghostbat. I didn't think the disparity between the new M5 and its rivals was as great as JustMe described. Nonetheless, the e60 is a great car. I think we neeed vids to see what some of the other factors were.

Just_me
04-18-2005, 08:56 AM
ghostbat, you are aware of that all cars arent the same, some cars with less or more horsepowers than factory times claim. Best time a german carmag ever clocked E55 is 14.6 sec up to 200km/h, best germantime for M5 is 13.5 sec. so dont stare blind on one single tset.

However, more pics and imprseed people
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=53168


not only from m5board, Rs6.com as well, no BMw fanatics there ;). You will see, videos will come.

Just_me
04-18-2005, 08:59 AM
just so you know, the cars was driven by their owtheir owners, driving skill is one factor.
"To clarify the races once more:

Gallardo:

we did rolling start from 50 km/h and 100 km/h then up to 240-250 km/h. If I waited to floor it until I saw the Gallardo floor it (he got the jump) he would be around one carlenght and that distance was constant up to 250 km/h and my feeling was that the M5 inched closer the higher speeds it got (see Adams post some days ago as well). If you didnt wait for the Galalrdo to get the jump it was sometimes the M5 first and sometimes the Gallardo first and then the distance between them was constant and I felt that the M5 was reeling the Gallardo slowly in over 180 km/h.

We did two races vs the new Viper and the Viper was clearly faster than the M5 under say 150 km/h but over that the M5 reeled it in alot faster than the Gallardo.

E55 was no match. in higher speeeds we talking around 5 carlengths is what I felt.

All of this is taken from memory and I have not yet seen the videos.

Also, a Techart 510 HP 996 Turbo was identical performance to the M5. Logically that 996TT was identical to the Gallardo.

993 Turbo with 430 HP Turbo S package was no match for the new M5, even when he cheated"

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 09:06 AM
Ok, if they were driven by their owners it's a complete new deal. But when you say that the new M5 humiliated some other cars it would be nice to see some figures and not just talk.. For example a 0-200km/h or 0-250km/h or whatever but some proof that the new M5 thrashes the E55, 993 Biturbo or the others. Right now it's just talk..

Don't get me wrong I don't want to start a new BMW vs MB debate. I love both cars but in all fairness I can also go out and take som pictures and say that the E55 crushed all it's competitors.. :wink:

Just_me
04-18-2005, 09:20 AM
Ok, if they were driven by their owners it's a complete new deal. But when you say that the new M5 humiliated some other cars it would be nice to see some figures and not just talk.. For example a 0-200km/h or 0-250km/h or whatever but some proof that the new M5 thrashes the E55, 993 Biturbo or the others. Right now it's just talk..

Don't get me wrong I don't want to start a new BMW vs MB debate. I love both cars but in all fairness I can also go out and take som pictures and say that the E55 crushed all it's competitors.. :wink:

they have no reason to lie. Everyone who was there was impressed by the M5, even Porsche and Mb owners. Besides there will be videos so why lie? , make your judgment after that and bmw has no reason to relese a new M5 that is slower than for instanc eE55.

and by humiliate, the M5 was five lenghts ahead of the E55 when they at higher speeds. If its humiliation or not, its up to you to decide.


Ghostbat, this wasnt a carmagasin, only some guys with their own cars.

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 11:17 AM
Relax! I'm not calling anybody a liar. I'm just saying that to me this is just a bunch of guys with nice cars out racing. It's great for the M5 owner if he whoops some E55 and 993 Biturbo ass but that doesn't change the fact that the E55 and M5 - when tested by well respected car magazines both in Sweden and Germany - are pretty equal in straight line performence with the M5 being slightly faster. Both cars reach 200km/h within a seconds difference.

According to www.dragtimes.com the 993 Turbo S does 0-402m in 11.900s @ 188km/h. I think the M5 at best can do low 12:s hardly high elevens.

So my point is that yes the M5 is a fast and amzing car but until I see som figures im not convinced.

Just_me
04-18-2005, 12:04 PM
I just talked to one of the guys there. He own a Rs4 and a C32 and I asked him about M5 vs E55. He likes MB a lot.

"Unfourtunaly" he said. He said its true, even though the M5 had very well used tires (later the tire broke on the M5) the car was faster than the E55. The E55 lost. M5 had better starts (even if not much was left on the tires) and higher the speed was, the distance become bigger. M5is faster.

He said that the M5 was really fast and impressed him very much. All this coming from a Mb fan.

So sorry MB fans, sometimes true hurts. and you will probably see it all on videos later. and remember who said it first ;)

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 12:19 PM
I just talked to one of the guys there. He own a Rs4 and a C32 and I asked him about M5 vs E55. He likes MB a lot.

"Unfourtunaly" he said. He said its true, even though the M5 had very well used tires (later the tire broke on the M5) the car was faster than the E55. The E55 lost. M5 had better starts (even if not much was left on the tires) and higher the speed was, the distance become bigger. M5is faster.

He said that the M5 was really fast and impressed him very much. All this coming from a Mb fan.

So sorry MB fans, sometimes true hurts. and you will probably see it all on videos later. and remember who said it first ;)

You just don't get my point, but we can leave it at this..

Just_me
04-18-2005, 12:36 PM
I just talked to one of the guys there. He own a Rs4 and a C32 and I asked him about M5 vs E55. He likes MB a lot.

"Unfourtunaly" he said. He said its true, even though the M5 had very well used tires (later the tire broke on the M5) the car was faster than the E55. The E55 lost. M5 had better starts (even if not much was left on the tires) and higher the speed was, the distance become bigger. M5is faster.

He said that the M5 was really fast and impressed him very much. All this coming from a Mb fan.

So sorry MB fans, sometimes true hurts. and you will probably see it all on videos later. and remember who said it first ;)

You just don't get my point, but we can leave it at this..

I dont care about your point, I care about the outcome. Even mention this in this thread is meaningless. Driven by ordinary people not by some carmag. I prefer this.
Yes please, leave it there.

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 12:48 PM
You are so wrong. Naturally a seriously performed test with high tech testing gear and the same driver in both/all cars is the best scientific way to test cars perfomance.

If you want to believe that the M5 is faster than most supercars, fine by me but I think most users in this forum understand that this "test" you are referring to doesn't mean jack..

Just_me
04-18-2005, 01:04 PM
You are so wrong. Naturally a seriously performed test with high tech testing gear and the same driver in both/all cars is the best scientific way to test cars perfomance.

If you want to believe that the M5 is faster than most supercars, fine by me but I think most users in this forum understand that this "test" you are referring to doesn't mean jack..


Just so you know, the driver of the M5 has only driven the car a few days, its not even his car. The owners of the E55 actually own the cars and have spending several hours and months behind their E55. They know their car more than the M5 driver knows the M5.

I seen test where E55 slower than M5 but it doenst matter. And faster than supercars, who fucking cares, all I care about E55 and what happend two days ago. (M5 accelerate faster, not several seconds but its faster and handles better and more involving than a E55.) So your carmags I dont care about it, so please create another topic where you describe your beloved E55 and that the car is fast like a M5.

And not long time ago you said we should leave it but you still bitching about it. Get over it dude.

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 01:11 PM
And not long time ago you said we should leave it but you still bitching about it. Get over it dude.


No I said "We" can leave it there, but obviously you couldn't :roll:

No shit that the driver of the M5 pushed the car hard if it wasnt his..

But yes the M5 is the fastest car in the world and no other supercar can match it what so ever.. :shock:

Just_me
04-18-2005, 01:14 PM
[quote]


But yes the M5 is the fastest car in the world and no other supercar can match it what so ever.. :shock:

Finally we agree on something :wink: :twisted:

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 01:18 PM
[quote]


But yes the M5 is the fastest car in the world and no other supercar can match it what so ever.. :shock:

Finally we agree on something :wink: :twisted:

Yes that's nice..Now maybe we can leave it to rest :?: :D

SPEEDKILLAR
04-18-2005, 02:21 PM
Relax! I'm not calling anybody a liar. I'm just saying that to me this is just a bunch of guys with nice cars out racing. It's great for the M5 owner if he whoops some E55 and 993 Biturbo ass but that doesn't change the fact that the E55 and M5 - when tested by well respected car magazines both in Sweden and Germany - are pretty equal in straight line performence with the M5 being slightly faster. Both cars reach 200km/h within a seconds difference.

According to www.dragtimes.com the 993 Turbo S does 0-402m in 11.900s @ 188km/h. I think the M5 at best can do low 12:s hardly high elevens.

So my point is that yes the M5 is a fast and amzing car but until I see som figures im not convinced.

I've couldn't have said it better myself, just face it Just_me, your over reacting, you try to give us the image that the M5 destroyed the other cars, well I can understand that from amateurs, they did a couple of runs and now the M5 is some kind of supercar :roll:
The M5 is a great car, and yes better than the current super sedans, but the difference is not big.

a little tip, try to be a little bit more realistic and think before you make ridiculous statements.

jon_s
04-18-2005, 02:21 PM
:shock: "But if everything goes as planned we're going to have a V10 fiesta!" Holy crap

Just_me
04-18-2005, 03:05 PM
MB fans crying like dogs here. I would do the same if I was a MB fan and the E55 was beaten by the mighty M5. Im realistic. The M5 beat the E55, cant be more realistic than that and now you have to deal with it. Speedyboy (acting so cool , he think is a speedkiller). Watch this closely speedyboy :fist:

Just_me
04-18-2005, 03:33 PM
Its all on video and both Audi and MB people who was there say the same thing. That day, the M5 was the king (if we dont count the 911 thats was doing 0-200km/h in 10 sec) of course. Im not saying the M5 is the fastest car every time but that day the M5 was the king and you have to deal with it. Your turn might come when your beloved RS6 see the sunlight. But for now, bow down to the mighty M5 cause all you gonna see is the ass of the car. :fist:

SPEEDKILLAR
04-18-2005, 05:02 PM
MB fans crying like dogs here. I would do the same if I was a MB fan and the E55 was beaten by the mighty M5. Im realistic. The M5 beat the E55, cant be more realistic than that and now you have to deal with it. Speedyboy (acting so cool , he think is a speedkiller). Watch this closely speedyboy :fist:

Bwaahahahaha, read this birdbrain, 'cause I really doubt you're 30 years old, do you know how to read english? Read my previous post twice before you post bullshit.

What an idiot, I expected you would react like a bitch, but I tried my best to explain it nice and easy but it seems you're to dumb to understand.

We'll continue our discussion when you grow up and think before you post childish and ignorant comment :roll:
p.s. I like that name, 'speedyboy' :D I'll use it on my msn, thanks birdbrain.

Ghostbat
04-18-2005, 05:16 PM
Its all on video and both Audi and MB people who was there say the same thing. That day, the M5 was the king (if we dont count the 911 thats was doing 0-200km/h in 10 sec) of course. Im not saying the M5 is the fastest car every time but that day the M5 was the king and you have to deal with it. Your turn might come when your beloved RS6 see the sunlight. But for now, bow down to the mighty M5 cause all you gonna see is the ass of the car. :fist:

No 911 (to date) does 0-200km/h in 10 sec. That's CGT territory..

Correct me if I'm wrong..

SPEEDKILLAR
04-18-2005, 05:22 PM
Its all on video and both Audi and MB people who was there say the same thing. That day, the M5 was the king (if we dont count the 911 thats was doing 0-200km/h in 10 sec) of course. Im not saying the M5 is the fastest car every time but that day the M5 was the king and you have to deal with it. Your turn might come when your beloved RS6 see the sunlight. But for now, bow down to the mighty M5 cause all you gonna see is the ass of the car. :fist:

No 911 (to date) does 0-200km/h in 10 sec. That's CGT territory..

Correct me if I'm wrong..

He's too stupid to correct himself, let alone correct other people :roll: :lol:

We'll have to wait a couple of million years until his birdbrain has evolved enough to think clearly and starts showing any signs of intelligence.

Pimp Racer
04-18-2005, 05:27 PM
MB fans crying like dogs here. I would do the same if I was a MB fan and the E55 was beaten by the mighty M5. Im realistic. The M5 beat the E55, cant be more realistic than that and now you have to deal with it. Speedyboy (acting so cool , he think is a speedkiller). Watch this closely speedyboy :fist:

Bwaahahahaha, read this birdbrain, 'cause I really doubt you're 30 years old, do you know how to read english? Read my previous post twice before you post bullshit.

What an idiot, I expected you would react like a bitch, but I tried my best to explain it nice and easy but it seems you're to dumb to understand.

We'll continue our discussion when you grow up and think before you post childish and ignorant comment :roll:
p.s. I like that name, 'speedyboy' :D I'll use it on my msn, thanks birdbrain.

HE sounds like a FANBOY!

@ Just_me: Sure the new M5 is great but not faster than every supercar in the world. Prove it to me you damn fanboy!

SPEEDKILLAR
04-18-2005, 05:33 PM
^^^^ pimpracer just a tip :wink:, you too should read the posts a bit better, although Just_me a.k.a birdbrain is exagerating, he didn't wrote that the M5 was faster than supercars.

Sir_GT
04-18-2005, 07:11 PM
Must say I'm a little confused. Since this info comes from Bmw fanatics I'm skeptical. And I seriously doubt that the new M5 humiliates the 993 Turbo with the S engine package.

In a comparison test in march between the BMW M5 and the E55 AMG Estate the performance figures were very identical. The figures comes from "Teknikens Värld", a well respected car magazine in Sweden.

M5 0-70km/h 3.10s
E55T 0-70km/h 3.03s

M5 0-100km/h 4.73s
E55T 0-100km/h 4.77s

M5 0-200km/h 13.73s
E55T 0-200km/h 14.33s

M5 0-250km/h 23.28s
E55T 0-250km/h 24.48s

M5 0-402m 12.68s @ 192.4km/h
E55T 0-402m 12.78s @ 188.4km/h

Both cars running on wintertyres and have in mind that the E55 has a 100kg higher curbweight and is behind on power but is torquier..

This is all straight line stuff. It's just as relevant as the fact that the 120d out accelerates the 320d... so what? With regards to the E55 and the M5, put the two on the Nurburgring, and the M5 will destroy the E55 anyway, so there's no point arguing about it.

Mercs are cruising cars... AMG's just help you get there faster. BMW's are track cars... the M cars being the most luxurious, best performing track cars you can buy.

SPEEDKILLAR
04-18-2005, 08:02 PM
Must say I'm a little confused. Since this info comes from Bmw fanatics I'm skeptical. And I seriously doubt that the new M5 humiliates the 993 Turbo with the S engine package.

In a comparison test in march between the BMW M5 and the E55 AMG Estate the performance figures were very identical. The figures comes from "Teknikens Värld", a well respected car magazine in Sweden.

M5 0-70km/h 3.10s
E55T 0-70km/h 3.03s

M5 0-100km/h 4.73s
E55T 0-100km/h 4.77s

M5 0-200km/h 13.73s
E55T 0-200km/h 14.33s

M5 0-250km/h 23.28s
E55T 0-250km/h 24.48s

M5 0-402m 12.68s @ 192.4km/h
E55T 0-402m 12.78s @ 188.4km/h

Both cars running on wintertyres and have in mind that the E55 has a 100kg higher curbweight and is behind on power but is torquier..

This is all straight line stuff. It's just as relevant as the fact that the 120d out accelerates the 320d... so what? With regards to the E55 and the M5, put the two on the Nurburgring, and the M5 will destroy the E55 anyway, so there's no point arguing about it.

Mercs are cruising cars... AMG's just help you get there faster. BMW's are track cars... the M cars being the most luxurious, best performing track cars you can buy.

Damn, since when did this started to be a Merc vs. BMW, please not again :roll:

Each car has its own pro's and con's, lets not act like little children in the same way as we did when we were kids, 'my dad is stronger than yours' type of bullshit :roll:
I love both and even as a MB fan, if I could get the choice between(for free) the two I would definatly would go for the M5(untill the new E AMG comes out), nobody said the Merc or whatever was better, its just the fact that some "BMW" fans act ridiculous whenever the M5 comes up in a discussion, get over it, and start to wright common sence instead of blowing this "M5" discussion out of proportion, please :!:

Just_me
04-19-2005, 01:57 AM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Just_me
04-19-2005, 02:08 AM

What is remarkable to me is the number of adults who pay around $90,000 just to quote 1/4-mile times. The vast majority of these seem to be E55 owners. Gustav's results are a data point. Neither Gustav nor anyone else who is mildly objective claimed that data point to be the beginning and end of the discussion. What hilsman and his brethren fail to understand is that, while M5 owners will enjoy beating E55s in straight line races, that capability will not make the top ten most important criteria in their purchase decisions. What matters most is how the car responds, how it feels, how it sounds, how close it comes to the epitome of modern design and technology, and the extent to which it manages to combine the seemingly incongruous goals of ultimate, uncompromising performance with comfort, civility and practicality. Is it more enjoyable to rev a V-10 engine of a truly modern supercar to 8,000 rpm and then trigger an inhumanly quick shift with an unsurpassed SMG transmission or to stomp on the gas pedal of an automatic supercharged finely executed sedan? Is it more rewarding to pilot the most technologically advanced sedan whose performance capabilities are unquestionably integrated to an unprecedented extent or a slightly aging design of a superb touring sedan fitted with a very strong engine? The questions are not necessarily rhetorical, but, I suggest, show that the debate is not properly reduced to comparing 1/4-mile times.

blah
04-19-2005, 02:29 AM
Im so divided....Atleast AUDI is still gay in everyones eyes. :lol:

Ghostbat
04-19-2005, 03:08 AM
Must say I'm a little confused. Since this info comes from Bmw fanatics I'm skeptical. And I seriously doubt that the new M5 humiliates the 993 Turbo with the S engine package.

In a comparison test in march between the BMW M5 and the E55 AMG Estate the performance figures were very identical. The figures comes from "Teknikens Värld", a well respected car magazine in Sweden.

M5 0-70km/h 3.10s
E55T 0-70km/h 3.03s

M5 0-100km/h 4.73s
E55T 0-100km/h 4.77s

M5 0-200km/h 13.73s
E55T 0-200km/h 14.33s

M5 0-250km/h 23.28s
E55T 0-250km/h 24.48s

M5 0-402m 12.68s @ 192.4km/h
E55T 0-402m 12.78s @ 188.4km/h

Both cars running on wintertyres and have in mind that the E55 has a 100kg higher curbweight and is behind on power but is torquier..

This is all straight line stuff. It's just as relevant as the fact that the 120d out accelerates the 320d... so what? With regards to the E55 and the M5, put the two on the Nurburgring, and the M5 will destroy the E55 anyway, so there's no point arguing about it.

Mercs are cruising cars... AMG's just help you get there faster. BMW's are track cars... the M cars being the most luxurious, best performing track cars you can buy.

You are very off topic Sir_GT. If you read Just_Me:s first post you understand that this thread is about straight line performance and nothing else. We all know you love BM:s but plz don't start a new BMW vs MB deabte. You can discuss this in plenty other old threads.

SPEEDKILLAR
04-19-2005, 05:32 AM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Is that all what you got to say, I knew you were to dumb to answer in an intelligent way, try harder birdbrain or go back to your beloved BMW forum :roll:


"a girl who lost her rabbit" :? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just_me
04-19-2005, 07:14 AM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Is that all what you got to say, I knew you were to dumb to answer in an intelligent way, try harder birdbrain or go back to your beloved BMW forum :roll:


"a girl who lost her rabbit" :? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

speedkillar, you sissy littlte girl, accept that M5 beat your beloved E55. I'm just telling you what happend that day. If you are a man enough you can handle it. so please stop crying.

twboy1999
04-19-2005, 02:32 PM
whats the big deal?
i read the thread on m5 board last nite

base on the event... the m5 was faster e55 and hang with the gallardo on high speed

maybe cause the car has 7 speed? and always in powerband?? i dunno

u dun want to buy the m5 because of the straight line speed.. u buy it for teh overall package.. handling etc... if it is fast on a straight line.. then it is a bonus

SPEEDKILLAR
04-19-2005, 05:43 PM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Is that all what you got to say, I knew you were to dumb to answer in an intelligent way, try harder birdbrain or go back to your beloved BMW forum :roll:


"a girl who lost her rabbit" :? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

speedkillar, you sissy littlte girl, accept that M5 beat your beloved E55. I'm just telling you what happend that day. If you are a man enough you can handle it. so please stop crying.

Bwaaaahahahahahahaa, stop it dude, are you writing dumb shit on purpose or are you actually that stupid, you crack me up :lol: :lol: :lol:

Keep on trying birdbrain :wink:

schnell318
04-19-2005, 07:41 PM
The M5 is a great car, and yes better than the current super sedans

Finally!! You accepted BMW is better than MB :lol: J/K

Who cares about this nonsense, to each his own 8)

Damn, since when did this started to be a Merc vs. BMW, please not again :roll:

Each car has its own pro's and con's, lets not act like little children in the same way as we did when we were kids, 'my dad is stronger than yours' type of bullshit :roll:

You really should do that, because the last time it happened, you got so carried away you got banned :lol:

blah
04-19-2005, 08:37 PM
Im so divided....Atleast AUDI is still gay in everyones eyes. :lol:



*checking blah onto the list of people to kill*

i wasnt on that list before???? :? :shock:

Just_me
04-20-2005, 04:39 AM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Is that all what you got to say, I knew you were to dumb to answer in an intelligent way, try harder birdbrain or go back to your beloved BMW forum :roll:


"a girl who lost her rabbit" :? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

speedkillar, you sissy littlte girl, accept that M5 beat your beloved E55. I'm just telling you what happend that day. If you are a man enough you can handle it. so please stop crying.

Bwaaaahahahahahahaa, stop it dude, are you writing dumb shit on purpose or are you actually that stupid, you crack me up :lol: :lol: :lol:

Keep on trying birdbrain :wink:

I'm messing with your mind Speedkillar :twisted: and it worked :agrue: :mrgreen:

SPEEDKILLAR
04-20-2005, 02:02 PM
Mb fans get over it- E55 lost against M5 :twisted: sorry speed killer :mrgreen: I see you crying like a little girl who lost here rabbit.

Is that all what you got to say, I knew you were to dumb to answer in an intelligent way, try harder birdbrain or go back to your beloved BMW forum :roll:


"a girl who lost her rabbit" :? :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

speedkillar, you sissy littlte girl, accept that M5 beat your beloved E55. I'm just telling you what happend that day. If you are a man enough you can handle it. so please stop crying.

Bwaaaahahahahahahaa, stop it dude, are you writing dumb shit on purpose or are you actually that stupid, you crack me up :lol: :lol: :lol:

Keep on trying birdbrain :wink:

I'm messing with your mind Speedkillar :twisted: and it worked :agrue: :mrgreen:

:? whatever :roll:

SPEEDKILLAR
04-20-2005, 02:03 PM
The M5 is a great car, and yes better than the current super sedans

Finally!! You accepted BMW is better than MB :lol: J/K

Who cares about this nonsense, to each his own 8)

Damn, since when did this started to be a Merc vs. BMW, please not again :roll:

Each car has its own pro's and con's, lets not act like little children in the same way as we did when we were kids, 'my dad is stronger than yours' type of bullshit :roll:

You really should do that, because the last time it happened, you got so carried away you got banned :lol:


I don't remember you?

schnell318
04-20-2005, 04:07 PM
Oh, BTW speedkillar ckeck this out

http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=53268

SPEEDKILLAR
04-20-2005, 04:18 PM
^^^^Same BS as ever, exagerating claims, it would be better if the idiot had real proof of this instead of bs talk.
This doesn't mean the M5 couldn't have won, but by how much, by a very small margin maybe :?

schnell318
04-21-2005, 03:01 AM
Your know what?? I really didn`t want to say this but the SL55 has a 5.5l v8 with a supercharger while the M5 only has a 5.0l normally aspirated engine, so the M5 in theory should loose...only it doesn`t :lol:

No matter what, someday MB will come up with a car that beats the M5 (at least in a straight line) but that day is not today :wink:

Small margin or not, the M5 won...videos will tell

Cheers

Ghostbat
04-21-2005, 03:28 AM
Small margin or not, the M5 won...videos will tell


So if a Mercedes fanatic goes out a film an E55 demolishing an M5 then that's proof that the E55 is faster?

Don't get me wrong. I know the M5 is slightly faster it's the method we all doubt..

dangerously_cool
04-21-2005, 03:37 AM
Are there videos yet?

schnell318
04-21-2005, 04:20 AM
I know it probably wasn`t a scientific method but several runs have proven the M5 is faster in real life with average drivers...

Videos will come this week

I really don`t care if the M5 is not faster than AMG cars but as far as I can see, it is

It is a pretty stupid argument, next RS6 will probably be faster than M5 and that`s the way it`s supposed to be :)

Ghostbat
04-21-2005, 04:27 AM
I know it probably wasn`t a scientific method but several runs have proven the M5 is faster in real life with average drivers...

Videos will come this week

I really don`t care if the M5 is not faster than AMG cars but as far as I can see, it is

It is a pretty stupid argument, next RS6 will probably be faster than M5 and that`s the way it`s supposed to be :)

"Propably"?? So you're not quite sure that it wasn't a scientific method?
You are a funny dude :wink:

SPEEDKILLAR
04-21-2005, 08:18 AM
^^^^^^ :lol: :lol: :lol:

schnell318
04-21-2005, 02:41 PM
I know it probably wasn`t a scientific method but several runs have proven the M5 is faster in real life with average drivers...

Videos will come this week

I really don`t care if the M5 is not faster than AMG cars but as far as I can see, it is

It is a pretty stupid argument, next RS6 will probably be faster than M5 and that`s the way it`s supposed to be :)

"Propably"?? So you're not quite sure that it wasn't a scientific method?
You are a funny dude :wink:

Of course I am, wrong choice of words...no big deal