PDA

View Full Version : Small question about the F40


Mopsdrops
02-05-2005, 11:12 AM
Does it accelerate from 0 - 100 kph in 4.7 seconds or 3.8 seconds ? or even another time ? thx..

|Nuno|
02-05-2005, 11:32 AM
Ferrari states 3.8 (but I think that's the 0-60mph time, not sure). But that depends a lot on the car and especially the tyres.

All the F40's are different from eachothers...so you can't really say that 3.8 (or any other number) is the time.

The 4.7 time is for the 288GTO.

jorge
02-05-2005, 12:01 PM
Road & Track tested it years ago and they published 3.8 seconds in the mag (0-60 mph) 8)

PATo355
02-05-2005, 02:41 PM
yes its more like 3.8 , just like the new F430

Wutputt
02-06-2005, 02:34 PM
If I'm not mistaken the official (= Ferrari claimed ;)) 0-100 km/h time of the EU spec F40 was 3.9 seconds.

mv
02-06-2005, 05:52 PM
This might help :

http://img186.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img186&image=senzo34sv9ur.jpg

As to the 0-100kph time Wutputt is right.

ikon2003
02-06-2005, 09:16 PM
That seems reasonable then:

0-60mph: 3.8seconds
0-100kph (62mph): 3.9 seconds.

mv
02-07-2005, 05:36 PM
That seems reasonable then:

0-60mph: 3.8seconds
0-100kph (62mph): 3.9 seconds.

Exactly the same difference as claimed in terms of the Enzo : 3,55/3,65

Porsche_Cayenne
02-11-2005, 04:54 PM
ferrari F430 with 0-100 in 3.8s ? :lol:

|Nuno|
02-11-2005, 05:15 PM
ferrari F430 with 0-100 in 3.8s ? :lol:

What?

Porsche_Cayenne
02-11-2005, 05:17 PM
3.8s for 430 is an optmistical number.... 490 HP (sure 450 effective on wheels ), not turbo... great car, but I think it's can do not better of 4.1-4.2

|Nuno|
02-11-2005, 05:18 PM
3.8s for 430 is an optmistical number.... 490 HP (sure 450 effective on wheels ), not turbo... great car, but I think it's can do not better of 4.1-4.2

Dude, the topic is about the F40. :wink:

Porsche_Cayenne
02-11-2005, 05:19 PM
Yes but if you read PATo355's reply...

|Nuno|
02-11-2005, 05:25 PM
Yes but if you read PATo355's reply...

And he is probably right. Two American magazines already recorded a 3.5s time from 0-60 mph (which I think is too optimistic), so a 3.8 to 100kmh should be possible.

Remember that Ferrari's claim is without Launch Control...

Anyway, we're talking about 2/3 tenths of a second, which is irrelevant IMO.

Porsche_Cayenne
02-11-2005, 06:43 PM
Yes maybe it's right.... EVO says 4secs...

360modena
02-11-2005, 07:05 PM
After quick verification, I'm sure an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow :) ... for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s :wink:

|Nuno|
02-11-2005, 07:09 PM
Sorry guys but after quick verification, I can say an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow :wink:

And for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s.

Where did you get that info (just curious)?

Like have been said before, Ferrari claims 3.9 for the F40 and 3.7 for the F50.
And I've seen those numbers confirmed by some magazines.

But then again, I've also seen some 4.x numbers.

360modena
02-11-2005, 07:33 PM
Sorry guys but after quick verification, I can say an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow :wink:

And for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s.

Where did you get that info (just curious)?

Like have been said before, Ferrari claims 3.9 for the F40 and 3.7 for the F50.
And I've seen those numbers confirmed by some magazines.

But then again, I've also seen some 4.x numbers.

4X times! I'm surprised about it. I've seen these times in every mags and Ferrari books I red, but I confirmed with the first one I found , it's called "Models Ferrari".

F40
http://img67.exs.cx/img67/1420/dsc028731wg.th.jpg (http://img67.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img67&image=dsc028731wg.jpg)

F50
http://img67.exs.cx/img67/8706/dsc028757qk.th.jpg (http://img67.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img67&image=dsc028757qk.jpg)

Wait a minute I will verify on Ferrari web site...

360modena
02-11-2005, 07:47 PM
Well after more investigation on the web I didn't found any informations that can confirm my data :( but have a look to that F40 http://www.mcarsweb.com/ferrari/f40.htm ...much more faster that an enzo :lol:

|Nuno|
02-11-2005, 07:52 PM
Yeah, I see... Like I said before the F40 0-100 times varies a lot.

1st: The Lightweight package: a factory option that brings the weight even further down. Around 50Kg, if I'm not mistaken...

2sd: Tyres. Since we're talking about a old car, newer tyres will make a big diference.

And then the usual factors that influence every car's time.

As for the F50, a 3.9 is only 0.2s off, so it seems reasonable.

EDIT: Haha, 3.5...

raphaelws
02-11-2005, 09:50 PM
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?

I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!

|Nuno|
02-12-2005, 10:40 AM
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?

I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!

Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.

I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.

mv
02-12-2005, 10:50 AM
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?

I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!

Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.

I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.

Clarkson is always wrong(almost :) )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60. :)

|Nuno|
02-12-2005, 10:59 AM
^^ True, true... :)

raphaelws
02-12-2005, 11:12 AM
Clarkson is always wrong(almost )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60.

ehehe yeah

|Nuno|
02-12-2005, 11:21 AM
And yeah, the LM does 0-100kmh in 3.2s and 0-60mph in 3.1s.

raphaelws
02-12-2005, 01:00 PM
And yeah, the LM does 0-100kmh in 3.2s and 0-60mph in 3.1s


hum.. that interesting!

chest3r
02-12-2005, 03:20 PM
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?

I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!

Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.

I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.

Clarkson is always wrong(almost :) )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60. :)

Forgive him.... He's three times older than you :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: