View Full Version : New Mitsubishi Eclipse GT (2006)
oantob
01-15-2005, 01:49 AM
From the MMNA (Mitsubishi Motors North America comes a next-generation Mitsubishi Eclipse. This new Eclipse GT features 260 hp, 3.8 litre V6, 24-valves MIVEC engine that produces 260 pound torque... enough power to play around...but IMO, the rims are to small or the car a bit to high...
some pics:
http://img133.exs.cx/img133/8783/eclipsegt06015tg.th.jpg (http://img133.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img133&image=eclipsegt06015tg.jpg) http://img133.exs.cx/img133/8048/eclipsegt06032ac.th.jpg (http://img133.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img133&image=eclipsegt06032ac.jpg) http://img101.exs.cx/img101/6037/eclipsegt06040eb.th.jpg (http://img101.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img101&image=eclipsegt06040eb.jpg) http://img101.exs.cx/img101/7599/eclipsegt06055ll.th.jpg (http://img101.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img101&image=eclipsegt06055ll.jpg) http://img101.exs.cx/img101/3908/eclipsegt06engine5sg.th.jpg (http://img101.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img101&image=eclipsegt06engine5sg.jpg) http://img132.exs.cx/img132/6531/eclipsegt06inter1oq.th.jpg (http://img132.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img132&image=eclipsegt06inter1oq.jpg)
Thanks to ImageShack for Free Image Hosting (http://www.imageshack.us)
vexor
01-15-2005, 02:05 AM
The looks are horrible, but it sounds like it might have some good performance figures with the 260hp V6.
HeilSvenska
01-15-2005, 03:15 AM
I really, really hoped that they wouldn't even consider making the concept into the production model, but i kinda expected it to be this ugly. What makes it all worse is that it was designed minutes away from where i live and i couldn't do anything about it.
http://www.motorsporten.dk/Galleri_2004/diverse/bil-nyt/Mitsubishi_Eclipse-Concept-E_01b-[Mitsubishi-Presselounge].jpg
http://www.motorsporten.dk/Galleri_2004/diverse/bil-nyt/Mitsubishi_Eclipse-Concept-E_02-[Mitsubishi-Presselounge].jpg
Toronto
01-15-2005, 03:36 AM
wasn't this supposed to have 2 engines?
5vz-fe
01-15-2005, 03:47 AM
TT rearend, wtf front and side.........to sum up...ugly as hell.
bmwmpower
01-15-2005, 04:36 AM
I think TT and 350 Z rearend
23790554
01-15-2005, 04:43 AM
i think it looks alright
oantob
01-15-2005, 05:27 AM
I like the concept more, rather the real one....
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/eclipse_concept-e.asp
and the concept does have two engine (Hybrid)
artypossum
01-15-2005, 12:54 PM
First of all, this is my return to the forums, i have been to busy to post for a while. This car is one of the biggest aesthetical disappointments since the bug eye scooby.
BADMIHAI
01-15-2005, 01:46 PM
Fucking POS. It looks like SHIT. It they would make it RWD or AWD it wouldn't be so bad. But if they put those 260 hp/260 TQ through the front wheels it's gonna suck ass. :fist:
Anonymous
01-15-2005, 02:10 PM
This is pretty much the car they will produce next year or later this year.
Shapes definitely does not look good. But nevertheless, it should be interesting engineering though.
BADMIHAI
01-15-2005, 02:54 PM
But nevertheless, it should be interesting engineering though.
Only on the basis that all engineering is interesting. But I see nothing special in the engineering of this car. :|
Daggernite
01-15-2005, 03:17 PM
I think it looks pretty nice, cant see what all the fuss is about.
I think it looks pretty nice, cant see what all the fuss is about.
I also don't find it that bad...if the rims seemed small to me, I would buy some optional or aftermarket...no big deal.
findleybeast
01-15-2005, 05:25 PM
I think it looks decent from the rear wheel forward. Not great but decent. The rear end, on the other hand, is ugly and doesn't fit the rest of the car at all
Schwalbe
01-15-2005, 06:42 PM
I remember the time when Mitsubishi made a better Eclipse. It was a car with turbocharged engine with AWD system... It was a long time ago. :roll:
ikon2003
01-15-2005, 06:47 PM
I dislike the look of this car quite a bit. Front is way nasty - looks cheap, like they imitated an economy car imo. and the rear lacks impression.
i think i prefer the previous two models.
Skaala
01-16-2005, 01:01 PM
yeah, consept looks much better
neilo63
01-16-2005, 07:23 PM
its so bulbus, nothing works on it.
ferrarif1fan89
01-16-2005, 11:31 PM
god, its so UGLY! it looks like a giant pimple with wheels! :oops:
SilenCe
01-17-2005, 06:52 AM
I don't like the car! The concept looks quite better.
ikon2003
01-17-2005, 01:31 PM
^yeah, while the concept might look better, i still don't think that's saying much.
yeah, consept looks much better
Well, is it really a surprise?...concepts usually look better.
ferrarif1fan89
01-17-2005, 09:09 PM
yeah, consept looks much better
Well, is it really a surprise?...concepts usually look better.
thats not always true. for gods sake, look at he BMW Z9 concept. downright horrendous. production 6 series looks MUCH better. but thats not saying much.....
OVERLORD_CHRIS
01-18-2005, 05:21 AM
Why do the Japanese insist on making desent looking cars (pre 2000 Eclips) and make them into the uglyest POS ever!?
dangerously_cool
01-18-2005, 06:11 AM
This car has one possible saving grace the way I see it. It has to have a performance AWD variant. Seeing as this didin't happen with the 3G, I'm not holding my breath. Good luck selling it to people who can get credit elsewhere...
oantob
01-18-2005, 11:47 AM
how much will it cost? $ 3000?
yeah, consept looks much better
Well, is it really a surprise?...concepts usually look better.
thats not always true.
That's why I've said usually :wink:
In spite of the example you've come up with (which I don't find a good one :) ) I still think that concepts generally do look better than the car which appears afterwards.
PATo355
01-18-2005, 01:30 PM
Horrible , i saw a concept in road and track magazine of an eclipse that might even have 2 engines , sad for em , another looser for mitsu .
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.