New Mercedes M CLass Off-Road testing pics!!

[philios55]

http://img77.exs.cx/img77/3051/w1640019km.th.jpg (http://img77.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img77&image=w1640019km.jpg)
http://img144.exs.cx/img144/9045/w1640023oj.th.jpg (http://img144.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img144&image=w1640023oj.jpg)
http://img144.exs.cx/img144/8373/w1640031gg.th.jpg (http://img144.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img144&image=w1640031gg.jpg)
http://img144.exs.cx/img144/8366/w1640040qp.th.jpg (http://img144.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img144&image=w1640040qp.jpg)
http://img144.exs.cx/img144/6722/w1640058xa.th.jpg (http://img144.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img144&image=w1640058xa.jpg)
http://img93.exs.cx/img93/7843/w1640068vg.th.jpg (http://img93.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img93&image=w1640068vg.jpg)
http://img93.exs.cx/img93/8143/w1640078se.th.jpg (http://img93.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img93&image=w1640078se.jpg)
http://img49.exs.cx/img49/9866/w1640099au.th.jpg (http://img49.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img49&image=w1640099au.jpg)

[No.1]

I guess it's not a soft-roader this time... that looks like some tricky terrain :shock:

Thanks for the pics 8)

[CSedl87]

The Cayenne and the Touareg are very good off-roaders... so Mercedes has got a lot of work to do trying to give the ML better off-road attitudes. I suppose it's better than the old one in that terms... but it's not as good as the others mentioned before, and the X5 as well. If I had been the MB boss... I would have changed the style of the car trying to offer an absolutely new ML... not a re-edition of a dull SUV...
The only car that MB offers that even comes close to the cayenne and toureg is the G-wagon, even then the Porsche/Vw platform does much better than the G.

[tekwar]

omg is that an M class that is actually off road?? lol

[SilviaEvo]

its ok. the rear is a little dodgy to me

[Chaos in 1983!]

I didn't like the old one...and from what I've seen so far I don't like this one either...

[neilo63]

I didn't like the old one...and from what I've seen so far I don't like this one either...

Ditto, i'll add that it's a POS but it's a huge improvement on its predecessor.