Log in

View Full Version : Alain Prost on Ayrton Senna - Interview with Nigel Roebuck


sameerrao
12-13-2004, 04:21 AM
Source: www.prostfan.com

1998

"Honestly, it's very difficult for me to talk about Ayrton, and not only because he's not here any more. He was so different, you know, so completely different from any other racing driver - any other person - I've ever known..."

Speaking now, more than four years after the death of Ayrton Senna, Alain Prost is in an invidious position, for while the two are linked for ever, indisputably the best drivers of their generation, so also each was very much the other's nemesis. That being the case, in discussing Senna, Prost cannot win, and Prost knows it. Come out with only kind words, and some will say that he sang a very different tune when Ayrton was alive; go the other way, and they will vilify him for daring to criticise a defenceless icon.

"That's why I have always refused to speak about him," says Prost. "When he died, I said, that I felt a part of me had died also, because our careers had been so bound together. And I really meant it, but I know some people thought it was not sincere. Well, all I can do is try to be as honest as possible."

From the very beginning of Ayrton Senna's Formula One career, back in 1984, his sights were set squarely on Prost. In a way it was inevitable, for Ayrton was a man of extraordinary intensity, one who needed to prove himself the best in all things, and at that time Alain was very much the king of the hill. It was their very first meeting that was to set the tone of their relationships down the years.

"I remember it very well. In the spring of 1984, the new Nürburgring was opened, and there was a celebrity race for Grand Prix drivers of the past and present, in Mercedes road cars. I was coming from Geneva to Frankfurt on a scheduled flight, and Ayrton was due to land half an hour before, so Gerd Kremer of Mercedes asked me if I would bring him to the track. On the way we chatted, and he was very pleasant. Then we got to the track, and practised the cars. I was on pole, with Ayrton second - after that he didn't talk to me any more! It seemed funny at the time. Then in the race, I took the lead - and he pushed me off the track after half a lap. So that was a good start..."

That year, 1984, was Senna's first in F1, and his Toleman-Hart was not on par with the front runners. At Monaco, though, there was rain, and when the race was abandoned, shortly before half-distance, the rookie was right on the point of passing Prost's McLaren for the lead.

"From the beginning, he looked good, although you can't always tell for sure when a guy is with a small team. He drove a great race at Monaco, but in those days - when monocoques were far less stiff than now - it was quite possible to have a poor car in the dry turn out to be very good in the wet. Of course we all rated him, but with the reservation that sometimes a young driver looks quite good, but then joins a top team, and looks ordinary. There's always some doubt until the guy gets into a quick car. With Ayrton, though, it was pretty clear he had a special talent."

"Something else people should remember is that, 15 years ago, there were a lot more very good drivers in F1 than there are now. For sure Ayrton did well from the beginning, but he showed nothing that was truly exceptional before Monaco. Monaco was the thing: after that everyone discovered him, and talked about him. Without that, it might have taken a little longer, but the impressive thing, as I say, was that he looked so good at a time when there were so many top drivers..."

Senna was also, from the start no respecter of reputations, and that upset many an established star. After a single season with Toleman, he joined Lotus-Renault for 1985, brilliantly won the Portuguese Grand Prix (again in the rain), and was a front runner everywhere. But at Hockenheim, for example, he made a mistake at the Ostkurve, and when Michele Alboreto went to pass, Ayrton swerved left and right to keep him back. Back then such tactics were not embraced by the F1 community.

"Hmmm, yes, Senna was very tough in that way, from the start. Actually, one thing I really believe now is that it wasn't so much a matter of being that tough as having his own rules. He had them, he believed in them, and that was it."

"He was extremely religious, and he used to go on about that, about speaking the truth, about his education, his upbringing, and everything else. At the time, I used to think that some of the things he did on the track didn't fit with all that, but now it seems to me he really didn't know he was sometimes in the wrong. As I said, he had these rules, he played by them, and he wasn't interested in anything else. Looking back, I really think he believed he was always in the right, always telling the truth - and on the track he was exactly the same way."

It was not, however, until Senna became Prost's team-mate, in 1988, that there were any problems between them. The year before, Lotus had used Honda engines, and Ayrton had established a deep relationship with the Japanese engineers. As he came to McLaren, so also did Honda. And one team insider puts it this way: "I tended to think of Prost as a McLaren driver with a Honda engine, and Senna as a Honda driver with a McLaren chassis."

"Yes, I think that was a good way of putting it. My biggest problem was that I really loved McLaren, and wanted to do everything I could for the team. For my team-mate in '88, it was a choice between Senna and Nelson Piquet. When I went with Ron (Dennis) to Japan, to meet the Honda people, I said that Ron should take Ayrton, because he was the more talented driver, and for me the team came first. If I was going back to the start of my racing career now, I would do it rather differently - I would concentrate on me and my job..."

"In fact, I could have said no to Ayrton coming to McLaren. One strength I have is that normally when I make a decision, I don't regret it, but, from my own point of view, on that occasion I definitely made a mistake!"

In the very first pre-season test the did together, in Rio, Prost saw that Senna was emphatically not doing this for the fun of it. "We were tyre-testing, just using one car. I did the first run, and he was then due to take it over. I came into the pits, and the mechanics began to change the wheels. I could see Ayrton there, helmet on, pacing around, waiting for me to get out, so I decided to stay in the car just a little longer. And he got furious, telling everyone, 'It's not fair, it's not fair!' Then I got out, and I was laughing. He was not...

"Actually, though, our working relationship through that first season was pretty good. The only problem was at Estoril, at the end of the first lap."

It was a moment which will never be forgotten by anyone there to witness it. Down the pit straight Prost slipstreamed Senna, then ducked right to go by, whereupon Ayrton swerved towards him, putting him maybe six inches from the pit wall. Alain didn't lift, and emerged into a lead which he would keep to the end, but afterwards he made his feelings plain.

"That move in Estoril was very dangerous, and, yes, I was angry afterwards. I was right against the pit wall, and I really thought we were going to touch, and have a big crash - with the whole pack right behind us. I didn't like it at all, and told him so, but, in a way, I can't blame him for doing it, because he did always get away with it. How many times in his Formula One career was Ayrton sanctioned for that kind of thing? Never."

"Still, apart from that, the first year wasn't too bad. On a few occasions he was quite tough and uncompromising with me, but we didn't really have any other problems. And, in fact, he did apologise to me for what happened in Portugal."

The pair had a staggering season in 1988, Prost scoring more points (105, from seven wins and seven seconds) than Senna (94, from eight wins, and three seconds), but Ayrton claiming the driver's championship, 90 points to 87, by virtue of the '11 best scores' rule which applied at the time.

"At the end of '88 I was very pleased for the team - we were first and second in the championship, and I really wasn't too upset that he won the title; I'd won it twice already by then, it wasn't a problem."

"For '89, though, I was worried about Honda. And I think my biggest problem was that I never had the relationship with them that Ayrton did. From the beginning, it was something I never felt I had under control. I wouldn't have cared very much if they'd simply preferred one driver in the team - but the way they handled the situation was very difficult for me, because Senna and I had very different driving styles."

"I never understood why Honda took his side so much. It wasn't that I thought it was a question of the Brazilian sales marked or the French market, or anything like that. It was more a human thing. I worked with Honda again last year - now as a team owner - and it struck me again: I think the Japanese just work differently. In a team, they always favour someone over the rest. I've heard it said about their motorcycle teams as well."

"Let me give you an example. At one point in '88, the last year we were allowed to run turbos, I asked for some specific changes to the engine to suit my driving style and we worked on it for two days at Paul Ricard. At the end of that test I was very happy - but at the next race, one week later, they never put that strategy on my engine."

"Then we went to the French Grand Prix - at Ricard - and suddenly the engine was just as I had wanted! You understand what I'm saying? Ayrton and I raced for two seasons together in the McLaren-Hondas, and at both the French Grands Prix I was on pole position and won the race. Everyone said, 'Oh look, it's Prost in front of his home crowd', and that sort of thing. It was nothing like that; it was just that at those races I had something which enabled me to fight..."

"Understand me, this is nothing against Ayrton, OK? Ayrton was very quick, and in qualifying he was much better than me - much more committed, just as I think I was when I was the younger driver in the team, against Niki (Lauda)."

"Anyway, before the 1989 season I had dinner at the golf club in Geneva with Honda's then chairman, Mr Kawamoto and four other people. And he admitted that I was right in believing that Honda was more for Ayrton than for me."

"He said, 'You want to know why we push Senna so much? Well, I can't be 100 per cent sure.' But one thing he did let me know was that the new generation of engineers working on the engines were in favour of Ayrton, because he was more the samurai, and I was more the computer."

"So, that was an explanation, and I was very happy afterwards, because then at least I knew very well that something was not correct. Part of my problem had been that Ayrton was so bloody quick, it wasn't easy to know how much was that, and how much was Honda helping him. So after this dinner with Mr Kawamoto, I thought, 'Well, at least I'm not stupid - something really was going on, and now I know the situation.'"

Whatever, the situation was not to improve. Quite the opposite, in fact. In 1989, the fragile relationship between Prost and Senna broke apart utterly, and that existing between Alain and McLaren was not a lot better.

"Until then, I never had a problem with anyone at McLaren, but '89 was different. My contract was due to expire at the end of the year, but Ayrton's was not. Ron knew the future of his team was with Honda - and therefore with Senna. He tried hard to persuade me to stay, but in reality he couldn't keep both of us, and I told him in July that I would be leaving at the end of the season. In my opinion, he was not fair with me in '89. We're still very good friends, and, despite everything, I still even now think of McLaren as my team. But Ron knows my feelings about that period."

"At the time, I was completely disillusioned. After everything I'd done with the team, and for the team, I didn't think I should have been treated like that. But at the end of the day, you know, Ron was trying to push his company to the front, and of course I can understand that a little."

It was at Imola that the most bitter feud in motor-racing history took seed. Senna and Prost, as usual, qualified 1-2, a second and a half clear of the rest, and Ayrton suggested that they not jeopardise their prospects by fighting at the first corner, Tosa, on the opening lap: whomsoever got there first would keep the lead. Alain agreed. At the start, Senna led away, and at Tosa Prost duly fell in behind him.

Then, however, the race was stopped, when Gerhard Berger had a serious accident. On the restart, it was Prost who got ahead - but at Tosa Senna snicked by into the lead.

"Afterwards, he argued that it wasn't the start - it was the restart, so the agreement didn't apply. As I said, he had his own rules, and sometimes they were very... well let's say strange. It had been Ayrton's idea, in the first place, and I didn't have a problem with it. Afterwards, though, I said it was finished; I'd continue to work with him, in technical matters, but as far as our personal relationship was concerned, that was it. And the atmosphere in the team became very bad, of course."

"By the time we got to Monza, I was ahead of him in the championship, by about 10 points. But that race. was the real low point between McLaren and me. Senna had two cars, with 20 people around him, and I had just one car, with maybe four or five mechanics working for me. I was absolutely alone, in one part of the garage, and that was perhaps the toughest weekend of my racing career. Honda was really hard against me by then, and it was difficult trying to fight for the championship in that situation. In practice, Ayrton was nearly two seconds quicker than me - OK, as I said, he was certainly a better qualifier than I was, but two seconds? That was a joke."

In the race though, Senna retired, and Prost won; by the time they headed off to Suzuka and Adelaide, the last two races of the 1989 season, Alain led by 16 points. By now McLaren-Honda essentially worked as two different teams, which happened to operate out of the same pit. Once again, the two red and white cars were in front row, both its drivers in defiant mood, Senna knowing he had to win, Prost making it clear he'd be no pushover.

"I told both the team and the press, 'There's no way I'm going to open the door to him any more.' We talked very often, you should know, about the first corner, the first lap, and Ron always said the important thing was that we shouldn't hit each other, we should think of the team. Well, as far as I was concerned, Senna thought about himself, and that was it. For example, at the start of the British Grand Prix that year, going into Copse, if I hadn't moved three or four metres out of the way we'd have hit each other, and both McLarens would have been out immediately. That sort of thing had happened too often; I had had enough."

"As for the accident between us at the chicane, yes, I know everybody thinks I did it on purpose. What I say is that I did not open the door, and that's it. I didn't want to finish the race like that - I'd led from the start, and I wanted to win it."

"I had a good car; I'd been very bad in qualifying, compared with Ayrton, and I concentrated entirely on the race. In the warm-up I was nearly a second quicker than him, and for the race itself I was quite confident, even when he started catching me."

"I didn't want him too close, obviously, but I wanted him close enough that he would hurt his tyres; my plan was then to pus hard over the last ten laps. As it was he tried to pass - and for me the way he did it was impossible, because he was going so much quicker than usual into the braking area."

"I couldn't believe he tried it on that lap, because, as we came up to the chicane, he was so far back. When you look in your mirrors, and a guy is 20 metres behind you, it's impossible to judge, and I didn't even realise he was trying to overtake me. But at the same time I thought, 'There's no way I'm going to leave him even a one-metre gap. No way'. I came off the throttle braked - and turned in."

A year later the two were back at Suzuka, once again to settle the World Championship, and this time it was Alain who had to win. Although no longer in the same team, he and Ayrton had not in any way diluted the intensity of their strife. Prost, said Senna, had better not try to turn into the first corner ahead of him: 'If he does, he's not going to make it...' In the event, at 150mph, the McLaren ran into the back of the Ferrari.

"Well, what can you say about that? After I'd retired we talked about it, and he admitted to me - as he did to the press - that he'd done it on purpose. He explained to me why he did it. He was furious with (FIA President) Balestre for not agreeing to change the grid, so that he could start on the left, and he told me he had decided that if I got to the first corner ahead of him, he'd push me off."

"What happened in Japan in '90 is something I will never forget, because it wasn't only Ayrton who was involved. Some of the people at McLaren, a lot of officials - and a lot of media - agreed with what he'd done, and that I couldn't accept. Honestly I almost retired after that race."

"As I always said, you know, he didn't want to beat me, metaphorically he wanted to destroy me - that was his motivation from the first day. Even in that Mercedes touring car race, back in '84, I realised that he wasn't interested in beating Alan Jones or Keke Rosberg or anyone else - it was me, just me, for some reason."

Right to the end of Prost's career as a driver, that situation never changed. But on the podium in Adelaide in 1993, Alain's last race, the two embraced, and it was as if, now that Alain was no longer a rival, Ayrton saw no reason for any more hostility. Prost was surprised by the gesture.

"Yes, I was - and also a little bit disappointed, to be honest. This will tell you something about Ayrton. In Japan, the race before, he won, and I was second. As we walked from the podium to the press conference, I said to him, 'This may be the last race where we are at a press conference together, and I think we should show the people something nice - maybe shake hands, or something.' He didn't answer me, but he didn't say no, either, so I thought maybe he agreed. We went to the press conference - and he wouldn't even look at me."

"In fact, I'd even thought maybe in Australia we could exchange helmets, the last helmets we'd worn in a race against each other - but after Japan, I forgot about it, because he hadn't seemed interested in any sort of reconciliation."

"Then we went to Adelaide, and finished first and second again. On our way to the podium afterwards, already he was starting to talk a little bit, and he said to me, 'What are you going to do now?' I was very surprised! 'I don't know yet', I said. 'You're going to be fat,' he sad, and he smiled. Then on the podium he put his arm round me, shook hands, and everything. Why? Because now it was his idea, and it was on his terms. OK, in any case, that was nice. But that was Ayrton - if it was his idea, fine; if not, forget it."

Later Senna would admit to a close friend that only after Prost's retirement had he come fully to realise how much of his motivation had come from fighting with this one rival. Only a couple of days before his death, filming an in-car lap of Imola for Elf, he amazed everyone with a spontaneous greeting: 'I'd like to welcome back my friend Alain - we all miss you...' Prost was touched by that.

"In fact, after I'd retired we spoke quite often on the telephone. He called me several times, usually to talk about safety; he wanted me to keep involved with that, and we had agreed to talk about it at Imola. That weekend he was talking, talking, talking, about safety, and he was much softer than before - for me, he changed completely in '94. He seemed to me very down somehow, without the same power as before."

"We had this conversation on the Friday, and I saw him again on the Sunday morning - after Roland Ratzenberger's fatal accident, of course. I was with a lot of people at the Renault motorhome at the time. You know how Ayrton usually was - he'd go from the garage straight to the motorhome, but that morning I was very surprised, because he came into the middle of all these people, which he would never normally do, just to get to me. We had a chat, and he was trying really had to be nice, to be friendly."

"Then I saw him in the garage briefly. I didn't want to disturb him, but I knew he wanted help, that he needed somebody. That was obvious. We were going to speak again the following week..."

Senna's funeral took place in Sao Paulo, four days later, and Prost was one of many drivers in attendance. It was not a particularly difficult decision to take, he said, except in one respect.

"I knew I wanted to go, but Ayrton and I had such a history for so long that I didn't really know how the Brazilian people would perceive it: would they be upset if I went, upset if I didn't go, or what? The day after the accident, I was in Paris, and a good friend of Jean-Luc Lagadere (the chairman of Matra) called me. His wife was Brazilian, and I asked his advice. 'I have my ticket ready', I said, 'but what do you think I should do?' He told me I should definitely go, that the Brazilian people would like that. I didn't have to be pushed - I already wanted to go - but he convinced me. And I know now that if I hadn't gone, I would have regretted it for the rest of my life."

"There was no hostility towards me in Sao Paulo at all - the very opposite, in fact. I'm still in contact with Ayrton's family all the time; the day after the funeral, his father invited me to his farm, and we talked for a long time. And I see his sister very often, do what I can to help with the foundation."

"Ayrton was certainly the best driver I ever raced against, by a long, long way. He was, by far, the most committed driver I ever saw. To be honest, I think maybe the best race driver - in terms of really applying intelligence - was Niki, but overall Ayrton was the best, by far. He was very successful in everything that mattered to him, everything that he set out to achieve for himself."

"Actually, I think it's not impossible that in time we might have become friends. We shared an awful lot, after all, and one thing never changed - even when our relationship was at its worst - was our great respect for each other as drivers. I don't think either of us worried too much about anyone else. And there were those times we did have fun together, you know. Not very often, but..."

"He was just strange, you know. In 1988, I remember, we had to go to the Geneva Motor Show for Honda; it's only 40 kilometres from my house, so I asked him to come over for lunch first, and then we'd drive there together. He came to my house - and slept for two hours! Hardly spoke at all."

"Then, after lunch, we went for a walk, and I still remember our conversation clearly. I liked to talk to him: sometimes it could be boring if he was going on about something, but usually it was fascinating. Yes, I think maybe we could have become friends eventually. Once we were not rivals any more everything changed."

"I look back on those days now and think to myself, 'Jesus, what was that all about? Why did we put ourselves through all of that?' Sometimes it seemed like a bad dream. Maybe because usually we were so much in front, it was inevitable that there would be problems between us, but why did it have to get so venomous - why did we have to live like that? I used to say to people, 'You're a fan of Ayrton Senna? Good, that's fine - but please don't hate me!' It was the same with the press."

"The pressure was so high, so high... If we had to do it all again, I think I'd say to Ayrton, 'Listen, we're the best, we can screw all the others!' With a lot of intelligence, it could have been such good dream. Still, even as it turned out, it was a fantastic story, don't you think? And I think, in a way, we're missing a little of that today."

sameerrao
12-13-2004, 04:28 AM
Another nice interview between Prost and Murray Walker from the same source:

Professor brainstorm

As a driver, Alain Prost was the most intelligent who ever started a grand prix. As a team owner, he has often seemed to leave his brain in neutral. In the second of an exclusive F1 Racing series of big-name interviews, Murray Walker probes the two sides of le Professeur.

Murray Walker: You were fantastically successful and credited with being the cleverest driver of your day. They called you the Professor. Did all that come naturally?
Alain Prost: I don't think I had to work at it. I thought a lot about how I could improve and that involved not just thinking about driving the car. But it came naturally.

Is it something in the genes?
There is absolutely no reason for it. If you knew my family, you would agree. My parents were completely outside motor racing and sport.

You've driven for two manufacturers (Ferrari and Renault) and two private teams (McLaren and Williams). Can you contrast the two situations?
It's a bit more complicated than that, because I knew Renault as a team and I knew them with Frank (Williams) when they still had quite a lot of influence, but you always have more pressure with a factory team and there are more politics.

Former American president Harry Truman allegedly had a note on his desk saying "the buck stops here". I think of Ron (Dennis) and Frank as more able to make decisions than the complexity of Ferrari and Renault.
Yes. Normally you would say you have more fun in a private team because there is less pressure. When I was at Ferrari, 1990 and '91 were completely different. Until the last two races, '90 was fantastic. The work and pleasure you could get from a win was fantastic. But as soon as it started to go wrong, it went wrong in a bad way.

I've always thought of you as being extremely brave, not just in terms of driving the car but also in your mental attitude. You were extremely outspoken.
I have never regretted speaking my mind. I have always acted the way I felt and I have never changed. Well, maybe I've changed a bit now because I'm talking a little bit less. But I like to say what I think.

When you said to Renault in '83 that the car wasn't good enough...
I have never said that to any team. Never. That's exactly what I would not accept now as a team boss. I would not accept one of my drivers saying that. In racing, the car is never good enough. At Renault in '83, I didn't wait until the end of the year to tell them what I thought; I told them in the middle of the year, when I was 14 points ahead of Nelson Piquet. I said: "We're going to lose the championship because of this and this and this." And, in my opinion, we lost the championship because of what I predicted. The choice of turbos, the decisions on development and the organisation inside the team – all that.

How did Renault react to that?
Well, I had more or less the same situation at Ferrari in '91. It's a funny story. In the week I was fired, I was talking with Ferrari about taking more responsibility within the team in terms of management. Even in Australia, we were talking every day with the lawyers. It was on my mind. How could I race and still do more? I was thinking about how I would reorganise the team when suddenly, at 2.00 a.m., I heard that they wanted to fire me. That was a strictly political decision. What is extraordinary is that, not more than four weeks later, they were talking about having me back! That is the truth. I was the same with Renault in '84. We were talking then about me going back in '85, but at Ferrari it took no more than one month for the discussions to start again. I didn't want to go to Renault because I was pleased with what I had at McLaren. And Ferrari would have been almost impossible because the pressure had been huge in '91. Can you imagine if I had gone back? The good thing about big teams is that you can have a huge fight, yet one month later you can forget everything.

Tell us something about the men you raced against. Nelson Piquet, for example?
A lot of fun. A nice guy. Fantastic ability. Knew the car quite well. Maybe a bit lazy. He didn't always go into all the details.

Niki Lauda?
He was amazing. Very intelligent. Very political when he was racing, but in a good way. I think he was better politically when he was a driver than now. He drove exactly the right way at the right time. In my time (McLaren '84), he was not quick, but efficient. Maybe in '75 and '77, he was quick and efficient, but it is always a problem to compare drivers of a different generation, and when they are 25 and 35.

Nigel Mansell?
Quick very quickly. He could get down to a time straight off. A huge ability to drive the car in difficult conditions. Not a good team-mate, no team spirit. Not very efficient – the opposite of Niki. Not a team player, not interested in set-up. He was good when he had the best car, but not when he had do develop it. Not impressive.

Gilles Villeneuve?
He was one of the most charming men. One of my first friends in motor racing. He was so honest and straight that he lost his life because of it. People don't know what happened in the weeks before his accident, and why it happened. It started just before Imola, then there was Imola, but it was all related. He did not kill himself. He was killed by people. He was so intense. I'm not sure he would have been world champion, but his is the kind of personality we love in Formula 1 and so miss.

I think of him in the same way that I think of Stirling Moss – that it is a criticism of the world championship that neither of them was world champion. Now, what about Michael Schumacher?
I am very impressed by what he has done. His ability to drive a car is probably in the top five of all time. But what has impressed me most is that he has created a situation at Ferrari which is unique. He understood the kind of ingredients that he needed to be successful. Obviously he has been helped a lot by Jean Todt, by Ross Brawn and Willi Weber – who I think has been a big part of his success. I remember seeing Michael on the podium many times when he was third and second, laughing and celebrating. Still enjoying it. Back then, I said to myself: "He will be successful".

The last is the inevitable one, Ayrton Senna. But before you answer, I want to tell you a little story. One year at Monaco, I waited four and a half hours outside the Marlboro motorhome to do an interview with Senna. The two of you were having a debrief. When the door opened, the first person who came out was you. I said: "You've been in there for four and a half hours. What on earth do you talk about for all that time?" You said: "Well, Murray, we talk about this and we talk about that, but I do not like to be the first to leave!" Did that sum up your relationship with Ayrton?
Yes and no. The team were very professional. Everything we could get from each other was important. If you left too soon, you would miss learning something.

But the way you said it, I had the impression that once you left, Ayrton would say, "And put another two pounds in the tyres."
We were very professional. Even when we had the big fight. It was a funny situation because we only talked to each other in the briefings. There, it was like we never had any problem. We were sharing set-ups and things on the car. I promise you – and I don't know whether the same is true for him – that I never, ever lied to him.

As someone who had enormous admiration for Senna, I never forgave him for lying about Japan in '90 (when the Brazilian deliberately crashed into Prost at the start to win the world title).
The only problems I have today are Imola '89 (when Senna broke a pre-race arrangement not to overtake Prost and won the GP) and Japan '90. I really suffered over them. Everybody lies in life, but when you lie for your own benefit... I suffered a lot. I almost stopped at the end of '90. For a few days I wondered whether it was worth carrying on, especially when I saw the comments in the papers that it was almost my fault! I remember one of the Honda engineers coming to me on the evening of the race and saying, "We have looked at the telemetry. It is unbelievable, Senna stayed absolutely flat until the impact." I thought, "Shit." Why didn't the truth come out? Living with that was very difficult. You must understand that Ayrton's motivation was to beat me. All he wanted to do was beat me. Being world champion was one thing, but that was almost second to the challenge of beating me. I was his obsession. As soon as I retired, he changed totally. We talked on the phone as if we had been friends for a long time. After I stopped, our new relationship made me forget about everything else. I remembered only the best of Ayrton and not the worst. It's like in school.

I look at you now and I grieve in a way because you were one of the greatest of all time as a driver. Then you decide to own a team and you seem to have had consistent misery and aggravation. Do you ever wake up in the morning and think, "Why on earth did I do this?"
Not every morning!

Drivers seldom make good team owners. Emerson Fittipaldi didn't, John Surtees didn't. Why did you do it?
It was not for money. It was for the challenge. I had the opportunity to have this team, but I was a bit naïve to think also that this could be a fantastic opportunity for my country. I was about 42 when I did it – very young. I always separate my private life and my business life, and I knew it would be difficult to find something challenging to do after being a successful racing driver.

Did La Belle France have a big input into the team?
Not really, but it felt a little bit like a duty. If I really loved motor racing, I said to myself, I could not leave Ligier to go under. If there was one small chance to be successful, I thought I should give it a go.

Do you think that there need to be F1 teams based outside England?
Yes. F1 must be organised to be successful in the long term, especially with the big constructors coming in. The culture of racing is in England, but it's very important that there are teams elsewhere. In France, we have big manufacturers, we have sponsors, we have everything to create a racing culture – but it's all going down. If all the constructors were working in the same country, it would become less interesting for everyone.

You've restructured your team. Are you now optimistic for the future?
Yes I am, but I have some problems. We have to think first about the short term, which is to improve things to get closer to the front of the grid. Then you have to think about the medium and long term, about linking up with a manufacturer having a better financial position. It's not easy, but I'm quite confident about what we have built. Where we are at the moment and where we were in September and October are so different. If people knew the kind of money we have invested in this car, they would be amazed. We are optimistic because we have now started a new process. I know that there are still a lot of rumours about our financial position. We knew that it would be very difficult, but things can only get better.

Can you comment about the money coming from Brazil?
I hope there is some coming because they (Pedro Diniz and his family) are our partners. They are the minority shareholders and you expect a shareholder to help the team in any way they can. Obviously, the South American part is very important and it was also one of the reasons they became partners, because I needed some financial help.

But it will remain the Prost team?
Yes, for sure.

Moving onto your drivers: has Jean Alesi still got what it takes?
He still has a young, fresh mind – it's incredible. But he's getting older, so he needs a better car more than ever. We saw what he can do in winter testing when things were going well and he was quick. Then he had a difficult time at the beginning of the year because we were facing a situation where it looked like we could not get back what we had done in the winter. The car was always understeering and we had a big problem to make the front tyres work. It's difficult to solve, so, while it's not getting worse, Jean was hoping that the car was going to be a bit better than it is. He still has the capacity to get a result one day if everything is OK.

Everybody thinks that they know why you took Gastón Mazzacane as a driver – that he was good enough and that he had a big wallet. But he doesn't seem to have been good enough. How difficult was it to sack him?
If I had not signed Mazzacane with PSN over the winter, it would have been almost impossible for me to continue. But I had to make the decision to terminate our arrangement after four races and it was not easy to do from a human point of view.

Did you personally tell him to go?
Yes. To be honest it was not very difficult because he knew that would happen. He knew exactly what we were expecting from him. Being between one and two seconds slower than your team-mate these days, when things are so close, is just not good enough.

Were you hoping when you signed Pedro de la Rosa (as a test driver) that he could replace Gastón if need be?
Yes. I was very cross because the de la Rosa thing came at exactly the wrong time for us. It seemed we were having all the problems all together, and the Pedro situation was maybe the worst thing we had at the time because we knew that he had a contract for this year and the year after, and we could also have had sponsorship with him. It was a perfect situation and we were set. Suddenly this happened.

How come you ended up with Burti? Was it a straight swap?
Yes, but it is a bit more complex than that. When I asked for de la Rosa back, I was also thinking, "OK, we stop the court case if you let me have Pedro until the end of the year." Then I realised that it might be difficult because he already has a contract for the year after and I don't think that it would have been good for us, or him. When they said to me they couldn't give me Pedro, but were happy to give me Burti, I said to myself, "Stop and compromise. Luciano is a good driver and he will be 100% committed to the team." Then we stopped the court case and this is where we are.

How good do you think Luciano is?
From what I've seen Jean and Luciano will work OK. It's very difficult to go into a new team in the middle of the year. What is most important for us is to have two cars, two drivers and two engineers, and have people talking to each other. Also, when the race starts on Sunday, we don't have everybody in the team thinking that, if we have a problem with Jean, we don't have a result. It's maybe sad for Gastón, but that's the way it is.

Do you regret getting involved with the team?
No, and I tell you why. I know myself, and if I hadn't made this decision in '97, I would have regretted it all my life. I've done it, it's been difficult, and I've gone for it. Sometimes I wake up in the morning and think "Shit!", but, funnily enough, I still want to go on. I know that I need very little to make this team start heading in the right direction. That could even happen in the next two months.

Is what you are doing now the hardest thing that you have ever done in your life?
For sure. It's very tough.

When you go to the great race track in the sky – we all have to sometime! – how will you want to be remembered? As a great team owner?
No, not a great team owner. A great person. That's what I would like.

Toronto
12-13-2004, 05:51 AM
I think I posted somthing like this b4. I will check later.

Toronto
12-13-2004, 06:10 AM
yes I did, sorry about that
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=15035&highlight=prost+senna

sameerrao
12-13-2004, 12:50 PM
Oops! :D

gearhead250gto
12-23-2004, 05:25 PM
Thanks for the articles.

griffith
12-24-2004, 03:52 AM
These are great articles and a fantastic read. Thanks for sharing!

Cheers
Andy

bmwmpower
12-24-2004, 03:56 AM
thanks, but i read it in 1999