PDA

View Full Version : Murciélago Vs Zonda (Roadsters)


a007apl
11-04-2004, 03:30 PM
http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=101088

yg60m
11-04-2004, 03:41 PM
Great !!! Two of my favorites cars :D Thanks mate 8)

a007apl
11-04-2004, 03:45 PM
:wink:

is64fun
11-04-2004, 04:05 PM
very beautiful 2 state of the art. tkanksss :lol:

23790554
11-04-2004, 07:34 PM
isn't there a lamborghini dealer in brazil?

No.1
11-04-2004, 07:36 PM
Great articl and great pictures too 8)

thanks for the link a007apl :D

i love the Zonda roadster, and to have the pair of them in one shot is amazing.

dons5
11-04-2004, 08:33 PM
The Zonda’s drag coefficient hits 0.40-plus.

What!!! how is that so, how does it hit 205-220 mph with that much drag, even the f50 didnt have that much i think it was 0.37-0.38 and it only hit 202. Now the Zonda has less then 50 more horses then the F50 513hp-550hp and more drag. Maybe that drag quote of >0.40cd was when the wings were at max downforce?? still how much could the rear wing make a difference would it put the car down to 0.32-0.34 from all the way over 0.40 when on minimum downforce?? it doesnt look like the slipperiest car out there thats for sure

sentra_dude
11-04-2004, 09:17 PM
Two beautiful cars...but I think I would take the Zonda, just that little bit more exotic. 8)

The Zonda’s drag coefficient hits 0.40-plus.

What!!! how is that so, how does it hit 205-220 mph with that much drag, even the f50 didnt have that much i think it was 0.37-0.38 and it only hit 202. Now the Zonda has less then 50 more horses then the F50 513hp-550hp and more drag. Maybe that drag quote of >0.40cd was when the wings were at max downforce?? still how much could the rear wing make a difference would it put the car down to 0.32-0.34 from all the way over 0.40 when on minimum downforce?? it doesnt look like the slipperiest car out there thats for sure

Well, its a convertible, and that gives it a lot of drag, I'm sure the F50's quoted topspeed of 202mph is with the hardtop on. I don't know if that .38 you quote for the F50 is with the top on or off, it seems high, so maybe with the top off? Just speculating.

Another thing to consider, when evo did a topspeed test of a whole bunch of cars they had trouble getting the hardtop version of the Zonda over 200mph...so maybe those Pagani numbers are just pie in the sky...

SPEEDKILLAR
11-04-2004, 09:23 PM
Damn, now if I were to have that kind of money, I think I would go for the Zonda because of its MB engine 8)

But there is a huge difference in price, so maybe I would go for the Murci.


Anyway I don't have that kind of money(right now....lol), and I don't like roaders that much, coupés are much more better looking and performing.

a007apl
11-06-2004, 09:58 AM
isn't there a lamborghini dealer in brazil?
Here in Brazil have one Gallardo, 2 to 6 Diablos(If have more, I'm dont have sure).

tata1234
11-06-2004, 11:21 PM
a007apl,

I had heard that Romario, a soccer player, has a Murcielago.

So our country has something like 5 Lambos at all.

nurbrun
11-06-2004, 11:41 PM
omg thanks so much. that murc is SOO nice

Kz
11-07-2004, 09:32 AM
To be honest i think the zonda's engine sounds freaking awesome!!! of course the lamborghini sounds awesome too, but its just something about the zonda's sound does it for me. But i love my lamborghini's, so i'll pick the murceilago roadster...it looks wicked with the rear air vents opened while driving :twisted: don't you's reckon?

oantob
11-07-2004, 10:44 AM
thanks for the link a007apl .. both is a great car, but even thou the murc 0 to 60 time is slower 0.1 sec and more heavy than the Zonda .. I still pick the Murc .. it's the style that counts