View Full Version : 56K no way! Super HQ pic
BADMIHAI
10-03-2003, 05:42 PM
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/eosdigital/downloads/landscape.jpg
BADMIHAI
10-03-2003, 05:44 PM
http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/eosdigital/downloads/fruits.jpg
The landscape is pretty nice, but I don't see the point of pics 3000x2000 pixels big.. I surf on a 17" screen, not at a theather ;)
Nemisis8u
10-03-2003, 06:11 PM
Pretty nice pics, but I hate how I have to scroll up and down and side to side to see the whole pic.
DeMoN
10-03-2003, 06:39 PM
OMG! i have a 1600x1280 resolution and it wasnt nearly enough to fit these pics. Imagin a pic that size showing a nude woman spreading her legs on the hood of a mclaren F1. Thats poster matterial right there!
heath
10-03-2003, 07:11 PM
yeh I get it....but I don't care...
sorry if I sound like a total fuck wit....
BADMIHAI
10-03-2003, 07:51 PM
OMG! i have a 1600x1280 resolution and it wasnt nearly enough to fit these pics. Imagin a pic that size showing a nude woman spreading her legs on the hood of a mclaren F1. Thats poster matterial right there!
Man , you really love the McLaren F1, don't you?
BTW: the pics are somewhere around 3600x2400 and each is 18 MB!!!
All courtesy of Canon, taken with their Digital EOS.
stracing
10-03-2003, 11:12 PM
yea i want to get one of those canon slr's
expensive tho plus they don't come with lenses
with resolution of abt 11mp they will get that large. you'll need to be carrying a 1gb memory card. luckily they use cf which is cheaper than ms, sd and other propietry stuff
SDK2003
10-04-2003, 06:03 AM
http://www.sdk2003.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/nsx_1.jpg
Jabba
10-04-2003, 06:17 AM
I like the black F355 in the background 8)
BADMIHAI
10-04-2003, 08:52 AM
Yeah, SDK! Your pic is also big (is it 4 or 5 MP?), but those are HUGE!
jon_s
10-04-2003, 09:39 AM
I like the silver 9-5 estate lol. No seriously!! 8)
SDK2003
10-04-2003, 11:34 AM
Yeah, SDK! Your pic is also big (is it 4 or 5 MP?), but those are HUGE!
Only 3.2MP
I'd like an SLR Camera but i'd rather wait for something around 8-10mp but cheaper than the current Canon 10Ds
BADMIHAI
10-04-2003, 11:43 AM
I like the silver 9-5 estate lol. No seriously!! 8)
Saab makes cool cars!
cho_888
10-05-2003, 03:38 AM
Dude these pics would be anywhere from 6 MP- 11MP (i think) there is the canon D10 (my dads) or the 1D or 1Ds. they take huge high quality pics and cost an arm and a leg.
and there is a cheap version at 6MP that has just come out called the 300D. It is cheap and comes with a lense. It is the cheapest in the rang.
BADMIHAI
10-05-2003, 08:31 AM
Dude these pics would be anywhere from 6 MP- 11MP (i think) there is the canon D10 (my dads) or the 1D or 1Ds. they take huge high quality pics and cost an arm and a leg.
and there is a cheap version at 6MP that has just come out called the 300D. It is cheap and comes with a lense. It is the cheapest in the rang.
They don't cost an arm, or a leg lol. When the first digital SLR (by Nikon) came out, it was $10.000 +. Now that's expensive!
SDK2003
10-05-2003, 12:58 PM
The Canon 1Ds costs £5499 ($9,182 USD) + lens
jon_s
10-05-2003, 01:40 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^FUCK ME!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Johns
10-05-2003, 03:36 PM
dammmmmmn! good thing I hve high speed :lol:
cho_888
10-05-2003, 05:34 PM
The new cameras and a lot cheaper compared to the old D2000 but they still arent cheap
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.