View Full Version : Ralliart 400hp EVO
Porsche911r101
10-02-2004, 09:29 PM
As most of you will know, Ralliart have produced the EVO400, which is to be mass produced.
Anyone got anything to say about it, any driving experiences?
any videos (i hvae hosting for anyones)
im quite excited about this, maybe more to see what Sti are gonna do to keep up (the EVO400 beat a koenigsegg in acceleration) :P
GT-R_R34
10-02-2004, 10:17 PM
is the fq400 and it's only limited to 100 unit with an est price tag of 45k pound.
oh and 0-62 in 3.6 sec top 175mph
Porsche911r101
10-03-2004, 08:37 AM
So its good then, anyone driven it yet?
£45k is alot of money for 400hp........
Ghostbat
10-03-2004, 08:51 AM
So its good then, anyone driven it yet?
£45k is alot of money for 400hp........
0-100Km/h in 3.6sec is pretty fast for "only" £45k.
Porsche911r101
10-03-2004, 09:11 AM
yeh but say spend that on an Escort Cosworth.....
evoWalo
10-03-2004, 09:19 AM
yeh but say spend that on an Escort Cosworth.....
And void your warranty all together. For 45,000 quid it aint all that bad. I'd like to see a Porsche pushing not to 62 in 3.6 seconds & still keep its warranty without the need for additional modifications. The CAR mag article enumerated the reinforcements, replacement/additional hardend parts that was added and rigorous testing it went through before it was sold.
Ghostbat
10-03-2004, 09:19 AM
yeh but say spend that on an Escort Cosworth.....
But you can't really compare a 10 year old car with a new one.
Dave1
10-03-2004, 09:44 AM
I read an article in car magazine testing this car and they were comparing it to a zonda (can spell the name of the manufacturer "pagani"?). I hate evo's simply becuase fitting a massive turbo charger to a 2 litre engine is not automotive exotica IMO. But a 7 litre NA V12 is!!! I respect this new evo because of its BHP per £. Car magazine have got the totally wrong end of the stick when it comes to performance cars, its not just about power :x . The evo is apparently quicker from 0-60mph and I got the feeling that the journo who wrote the article was getter an erection over this. There was no mention of 0-100mph or 50 -100mph etc which IMO is far more relivent for cars producing this kind of horse power, than teenager wet dreams 0-60 times for which family hatchbacks are benchmarked on.
Tomerville
10-03-2004, 09:50 AM
Just read the October issue of CAR. They compare it to the Zonda
evoWalo
10-03-2004, 10:30 AM
Performance cars are really all about power. Evos have a racing pedigree rooted in WRC. Normally we would see the Evo being compared to an Impreza but for this instance Subaru doesnt have anything comparable so I guess they decided on using the Zonda and the Murcielago as they clock about the same time.
Once Mitsu UK starts selling the final car and offer one to journos for testing we'll see how much brute force Mitsu was able to squeeze out of the cars. Mitsu UK will only sell 100 units of this car only for the UK market while Ferrari only made 399 Enzos worldwide.
Dave1
10-03-2004, 01:12 PM
[quote="evoWALO"]Performance cars are really all about power.
Sorry but that’s a load of rubbish. If that were the case everyone who wanted a high performance car would go and buy Nissan skyline and tune it to 1000BHP. So ask yourself, why don't they?
evoWalo
10-03-2004, 02:01 PM
Nissan Skylines arent being made anymore?
People dont like buying second hand cars?
People dont like Japanese cars?
People dont want to bother with tuning cars?
People arent willing to spend on tuning cars?
People want a stock performance car?
People dont want to void their warranties.
People find 1000BHPs too much performance.
People can afford to buy & are willing to live with the headaches of buying a car like the Zonda?
Would people be so mesmerized with the Ford GT, Carrera GT, McMerc SLR, Enzo, Zonda, etc if they didnt post impressive 0-62mph times or be among the top 10 cars on TG's lap times? Sure they're nice to look at, they're of a limited run/availability and are devilishly expensive but if they're all show but no go then that's sad.
Kindly explain to me what performance cars are all about? It cant be all about engines then we'd need to include the Ford Thunderbird. As far as I'm concerned performance cars or big engine displacement cars does not equate to exotic cars.
The Evo is the faster car thus it is the better car than the Zonda in terms of performance.
CSedl87
10-03-2004, 02:34 PM
Nissan Skylines arent being made anymore?
People dont like buying second hand cars?
People dont like Japanese cars?
People dont want to bother with tuning cars?
People arent willing to spend on tuning cars?
People want a stock performance car?
People dont want to void their warranties.
People find 1000BHPs too much performance.
People can afford to buy & are willing to live with the headaches of buying a car like the Zonda?
Would people be so mesmerized with the Ford GT, Carrera GT, McMerc SLR, Enzo, Zonda, etc if they didnt post impressive 0-62mph times or be among the top 10 cars on TG's lap times? Sure they're nice to look at, they're of a limited run/availability and are devilishly expensive but if they're all show but no go then that's sad.
Kindly explain to me what performance cars are all about? It cant be all about engines then we'd need to include the Ford Thunderbird. As far as I'm concerned performance cars or big engine displacement cars does not equate to exotic cars.
The Evo is the faster car thus it is the better car than the Zonda in terms of performance.
Exotic cars usually do mean high price tag, Rolls, Bentley, Maybach (not all are very high performers). Now there's the Supercar, which are sporty exotic cars; These cars are the Ferraris, Lambos, Porsches, etc. The Supercars usually have high HP #'s and good suspension. And whats funny, you kinda cross yourself. 1000hp too much? I thought performance cars were all about 'Power.' The tuning scene is very large worldwide, people love buying second hand cars (cheaper), People love jap cars (but not all), People love working/tuning cars, people want to spend money to customize their car, stock performance isn't enough for alot of people (why the tuning world is so big), Alot of people don't care about their warranties, If 1000 hp is too much for them than they're pussies, and the Zonda is a masterpeice, and their reliability isn't all that bad, So there aren't really any 'headaches' as you say. Also the Skyline IS still being produced.
Dave1
10-03-2004, 02:35 PM
OK the skyline was a bad example. You said that with a performance car power is the only factor. What about handling, grip, noise, style? You mentioned "all show and no go" what about all go and no show. Its each to their own.
Just out of curiosity if you had a choice between a car with a 500BHP 7 litre V12 or a 500bhp 2 litre 4 pot turbo, which would you choose? (and answer honestly :wink: )
And by the way the new evo is not quicker than a zonda only from 0-62mph. :wink:
evoWalo
10-03-2004, 03:45 PM
CSedl87: Just citing some reason why someone wouldnt want to get a Skyline & pump it up to 1000bhp. Too much of a good thing can be bad to some people. There are headaches to driving a Zonda. Would you make it into your daily drive for one? Does it have an adequate boot? Does it seat 4-5 people? Will it handle city streets with all its defects and speed bumps? The Nissan Skyline GTR stopped production with the R34.
Dave1: Dude the Evo is designed for rallying (tarmac, gravel, snow) and that requires extremely good handling and grip that's why it's AWD. While the Zonda is RWD because it was designed to go on well paved roads. WTF are you mambling about handling and grip? Noise and style are really minor considerations when you're talking about performance cars and more to do with exotics/super cars. That's why even a riced out Civic can be considered a performance car if it goes fast enough and handles and grips well. Then again you'd spend bundles upgrading a Civic to Zonda-like performance that you may as well plunk down for a MR or a WR1
Performance cars can be excused to be all go and no show. Hell man if Minardi were offered a car that would could leave Schumi in the dust but looks like a loaf of bread I bet they'd get it.
Man cannot motor alone on an engine, he must have a complete car. :mrgreen: As a car to go on dates and have TT take photos off I'd pick the Zonda but for a daily drive I'd pick the Evo. :) Using a different line of thinking I could buy one FQ400 for everyday of the week for the price of just one Zonda. I honestly preffer a Lambo/Ferrari/Porsche over a Paganni. ;) The unwashed masses wouldnt know what to make of a Zonda.
The Evo accelerates faster than the Zonda. Honestly, the only place you can test the top speed would be on a race track, an abandoned airport landing strip or some parts of the autobahn.
Dave1
10-03-2004, 06:28 PM
I was originaly having a go at the people who write CAR magazine not having a dig at the Evo. If you read my first post I said that I respect the Evo because its value £ per BHP. Its just not my kind of thing. It's obviously yours and that’s fine by me. :)
I'll come back to my original argument the power is not the only factor for performance cars. The Mclaren F1 is the best performance road car ever made but its NOT the most powerful. I think this proves my point.
Gabriel343
10-03-2004, 06:34 PM
This EVO has a guarantee?
evoWalo
10-04-2004, 03:39 AM
Dave1: You're confused. The F1 is considered to be a performance road car but not the best performance road car. It fits the bill of a super/exotic car.
Gab: It has a manufacturer's warranty.
hemi_fan
10-04-2004, 08:33 PM
WOW, this thing would be amazing to drive! I drove the Ralliart Lancer, it had 170hp, FWD... it actually was pretty damn good. Really good handling and brakes on it, seats were nice too. Same gearbox as the EVO, it has a real nice shift feel. My dad was gunna buy it except import taxes brought the price of the small car up WAAYY too high.
This EVO has a guarantee?
And if anything like the EVO warranties in the States - be sure to never take your car to a track day - they will void the warranty... be sure never to do any hard launches - they will void your warranty...
And above all else, don't post anything about your car driving exploits on the EVO Forums - they will void your warranty.. :P
espen
10-05-2004, 06:04 AM
Actually, the thing about evos and Imprezas is taht they are so user friendly that even with modest power, they humble most cars on a real world road. You can carry so much speed into a corner that an opponent needs a massive power advantage to catch up on the straights - and going seriously fast on a public road is just stupid. So an average joe like us would end up using 80% of the potential in a car like this, or 50% of the potential in an exotic supercar.
Now, add power to the already fast evo or preza... things get ugly real fast. At a track day in may, a friend of mine and I humiliated a F360, a couple of 911 (including 993"RS"), a bunch of tuned Cossies, BMWs and Audis around the Våler track north of Oslo, Norway. Sure, since the Impreza was just BPU (250-260hp) on RE540s at the time some of the cars would fly by down the straight, but who cares when you can pass them on the putside and pull out a good 100m on the rest og the lap?
Cant wait till spring, just put some Stoptech 330mm brakes on the preza. :twisted: And a buddy just got an equal length header and VF22 turbo on his, now it pulls 1.0 bar right into the limiter. Funny, the third gear did'nt enjoy that for very long :lol:
Porsche911r101
10-05-2004, 10:18 AM
Jabba had a skyline, he told me he misses it and wants another one, this was some time ago when Jabbasworld was first created. The skyline was standard.
Nissan Skylines arent being made anymore?
People dont like buying second hand cars?
People dont like Japanese cars?
People dont want to bother with tuning cars?
People arent willing to spend on tuning cars?
People want a stock performance car?
People dont want to void their warranties.
People find 1000BHPs too much performance.
People can afford to buy & are willing to live with the headaches of buying a car like the Zonda?
Would people be so mesmerized with the Ford GT, Carrera GT, McMerc SLR, Enzo, Zonda, etc if they didnt post impressive 0-62mph times or be among the top 10 cars on TG's lap times? Sure they're nice to look at, they're of a limited run/availability and are devilishly expensive but if they're all show but no go then that's sad.
Kindly explain to me what performance cars are all about? It cant be all about engines then we'd need to include the Ford Thunderbird. As far as I'm concerned performance cars or big engine displacement cars does not equate to exotic cars.
The Evo is the faster car thus it is the better car than the Zonda in terms of performance.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.