Diablo vs Murciélago vs Canto

[a007apl]

http://www.jabbasworld.net/photopost/data/501/602trediablo.jpg
Well, all its great but i Love the Lamborghini Canto :D

[yg60m]

I like the original Diablo and i find that the Canto is a bit "over"-designed even if it could have been great. But my vote goes for the Murcielago as it is modern and homogeneous. I really hesitated with the Diablo but ... Murcielago.

[a007apl]

its very good too :D

[nurbrun]

I personally like the diablo more, but onli if it was a 97, it is the best year. It was the last year Lamborghini was Lamborghini, and not audi. But I voted for the Murcielago because it is probably more practical than a Diablo. :D

[PATo355]

I love the diablo , i love the canto , but the Murcielago is the best of them all , the best Italian ingredients put together by the best german engienering

[Mopsdrops]

Diablo !!! for ever !!! never heared of the lambo canto before. but damn its nice, reminds me of a true supercar. the lights of an NSX-R. nice !!!

[sikx5]

Wheres the vote for the countach dude? somethin about that car is just so exciting to look at. it looks more predator than the others...more devilish :twisted:

but out of that lot i like diablo most :mrgreen:

[Fleischmann]

I know too little about the Canto and there are two few pics (none, without the sticky tape I think) for me to say anything about the car.

Diablo 6.0 rocks for me :D

[jorge]

My favourite is the diablo, i think the first model is one of the best looking cars ever!

[fabro_s]

I love the Diablo, I think its the best description for lamborghini, and I also miss the Diablo looks alot, hope theres a new Diablo soon, and by the way, what happened to the Canto???? it is not going to production???? :?

[JiggaStyles09]

yea the overall best car is the murcielago, but my vote goes to the diablo, reakky was my favorite drsign of the '90s

[Vansquish]

My Vote goes to the Canto. The Diablo runs it a close second and the Murcielago a somewhat distant third. The designers at Audi have made the Murcielago and Gallardo into attractive, but far too understated cars for their performance and for Lamborghini's shock-value-bound history. The Diablo was a more homogeneous design than the Countach, but maintained its aggressive class-defining stance and it just shouts "SUPERCAR". The Canto manages to revert a bit from the Diablo and return to some of the core values of the Countach. It is outrageous, perhaps even ugly from some eyes, but at least it was a bold statement and a proper supercar. I choose it over the Diablo and the Murcielago.

[gucom]

i always loved the Canto's styling, and it'd prolly be 1 fast son of a b*tch, so thats 1st for me (shame htey didnt replace the Diablo with it, its so much more outrageous than the murci)
2nd is diablo, its just sooooooo beautiful and exotic lookign with that nose so low down at the ground, its basically the most exotic looking car ever.
3rd is the murcielago, its very special and exotic by any standards except lambo's


It was the last year Lamborghini was Lamborghini, and not audi.
_______________

erm well actually Lambo were part of Chrysler when they started the Diablo and part of an indonesian investment group or something like that after '92 or so, so in '97 Lambo wasnt independent either.

[saadie]

erm well actually Lambo were part of Chrysler when they started the Diablo and part of an indonesian investment group or something like that after '92 or so, so in '97 Lambo wasnt independent either.

yah lambo was a part of chrysler but sill lambo made the car all alone ... chrysler just gave the money ... and didnt interfere in the designs and all ... yah and the cars were made in italy .. :roll: ..

anywayz my vote goes for Murcielago . 8) 8) 8)

[a007apl]

Wheres the vote for the countach dude?
Voted you in section "Best Design ever" ?
:wink:

[szumszer]

diablo, you can't do better than this devil in terms of shock value, I mean it will shock as much as an enzo or mclaren f1 ... timeless shocker

[cavallino]

The Murcielago is a seemless design that'll never lose it's shape, just like all other lambos.

[gdc]

Diablo...

Most extreme design of Lambo...Ferocious , aggressive...

And Murcielago I think is too much Audi~

[HeilSvenska]

The Murcielago is a seemless design that'll never lose it's shape, just like all other lambos.

Murcielago will never lose its shape because it mooched off of all other mid engine lamborghinis. It's a caricature of Lamborghini.
Basic shape of Diablo + Countach front bonnet and door curves + Miura rear lights and engine cover
worked out nicely though

Canto would have made a nice departure to edgy lamborghinis, back to Miura curves

But still, All hail the mighty Diablo.

[stradale]

yah lambo was a part of chrysler but sill lambo made the car all alone ... chrysler just gave the money ... and didnt interfere in the designs and all ... yah and the cars were made in italy .. :roll: ..


That's not true at all. Marcello Gandini's first design for the Diablo was rejected by Chrysler. His second design was altered by Chrysler's design studio in the US. The end result is what we all know as the Diablo. BTW, Audi has proved himself as an outstanding owner I think.

Donckerwolcke is a brilliant designer I think. Anyone who calls the Murciélago understated either hasn't seen one in real life or makes absolutely no sense to me.
It's hard to choose between the Diablo and Murciélago, they're both so special. I love the overall design of the Diablo and the same goes for the Murciélago plus all the styling cues of Lamborghini past in the design. I'm glad the Canto project was cancelled because, frankly, it looks horrible. However outrageous it may look, I don't agree it would fit the Lamborghini profile. Simply because Lamborghinis doesn't have a history of badly styled cars.

Just made my mind up, I vote for the Murciélago.

[yg60m]

That's exactly what i tried to say above, i think the Canto would have been a mistake because really too much. Think about the Miura, well proportionned and look at the Canto, disproportionned ...